Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 5 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2999 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Aarhus Convention and Access to Environmental Justice

Meeting date: 3 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

It is disappointing that Douglas Lumsden is trying to boil it all down to one particular decision and one particular issue. I respect the fact that there will be communities that want to challenge the pylon lines. It was the same with the Beauly to Denny case. There will also be communities that want to challenge other forms of development, such as fracking, Mr Lumsden, fossil-fuel power stations at Peterhead and wind farms. They should all have the right to challenge such developments, but the justice system needs to respond quickly and proportionately.

The planning system is also hugely important. It deals with where renewable energy development should take place—and where battery storage should be, because we need more of that, Mr Lumsden—and the role of communities in that system is absolutely critical. That is the same for pylon lines, for renewable energy, for the dualling of the A96 and for all the other developments that many people feel are necessary and which, in some cases, the Government wishes to support. They need to be adequately planned before things get to the point of judicial review.

The climate and nature crises are only worsening, so we need to deliver environmental justice, and we cannot wait another decade for the principles of the Aarhus convention to be fully enshrined in Scots law.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

General Question Time

Meeting date: 3 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Women, particularly disabled women, experience sexual assault and harassment on public transport and have expressed concern about being less safe in unstaffed stations. What actions does the Government intend to take to guarantee women’s safety, particularly at the growing number of unstaffed stations?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Aarhus Convention and Access to Environmental Justice

Meeting date: 3 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

If I have time, I will take Mr Lumsden’s intervention.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

I have a question about the target areas that are not included in the bill. The advisory group originally recommended targets on positive outcomes for biodiversity from public sector and Government policy—for example, on investment in nature. Do you have a view on those areas? Do you already set targets in those areas?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Does Mark Lodge have anything to add?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

The bill will change the duty on relevant public bodies. Currently, they have to “have regard to” national park plans, which will shift towards a duty to “facilitate the implementation of” the plans. I am interested in the perspectives of all three of you about what might change as a result of that.

Grant, I am aware of the long and difficult history with Highlands and Islands Enterprise in relation to the management of Cairngorm mountain. I am aware that there might be tensions in relation to Forestry and Land Scotland and that there are definitely tensions in the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park and perhaps further afield. What will change as a result of the wording changing from “have regard to” to “facilitate the implementation of”?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

How will that change the dynamic in relation to HIE specifically? In your example, you are talking about areas in which there is already a degree of consensus—changes that need to happen with deer management—so you are pushing public agencies to deliver similar objectives. I am interested in the areas in which there might be tension between a commercial interest and the aims of the park. Will the change in the law change that dynamic?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Mark, what does this look like from a local authority perspective?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Okay. Grant Moir, do you have any desire for extra powers?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill:Stage 1

Meeting date: 2 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Do you already report to your board on areas such as the understanding of citizens and society? Are they already key performance areas in the park?