The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2435 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
We are interested in those sections of the bill that relate to deer management, as the convener described. We are interested, in particular, in your comments on the incorporation of nature restoration as a ground for intervention—we discussed that in the previous session; the proposed changes to the control measures; and NatureScot’s ability to recover the expanded costs.
I see that Mr Orr-Ewing would like to go first.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in Grant Moir’s point about public institutions effectively doing a lot of the planning in this area. If a national park has a herbivore management strategy—Cairngorms has one, but I do not know whether Loch Lomond and the Trossachs has one yet, and maybe there will be one for Galloway in the future as well—that is a plan that is in place. Under the bill, FLS will have to facilitate the delivery of that as part of the park plan, so public institutions will be working to deliver that. Does that help to guide and steer the public interest? Could that be used, through the code of practice, as a way for NatureScot to consider how private actors in that space link in with the objectives?
I am thinking about the status. You have a park plan and a herbivore strategy. Should those have weight? How should that be taken into account when NatureScot makes decisions to require those with private interests to take action that aligns with the public interest in a plan that has gone through a democratic process, been approved by a park board and everything else?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you want a pilot to be introduced in an area where journey times are being speeded up through bus priority measures? Does it make sense to bring all these interventions together? I think that that was your earlier point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do David or Duncan have thoughts on the pilot? Do you welcome it? Do you want it in your area, or should it go somewhere else? How should the pilot be run?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Paul, what are your thoughts on flat bus fares and on anything that we can learn from England, where they have been introduced?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Duncan Cameron and David Frenz, your companies offer services in England as well as Scotland. Are there any differences between England and Scotland in terms of antisocial behaviour?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
However, England does not have a concessionary travel scheme for under-22s.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am sorry, Joanne, I do not mean to interrupt, but I go back to my very specific question, which related to concerns that the unions have. Will the changes result in fewer staff being available at stations or stations being unstaffed for longer periods? That is the issue that unions, disability groups and others are concerned about—it is the staffing at stations. I am well aware of some of the reasons for the business model changes with regard to ticket sales, but it would be great if you could address that point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
What do you think is the underlying concern from trade union groups? We have heard evidence of concerns that there could be female staff, in particular, working alone at stations, and there is obviously a background concern about antisocial behaviour and what happens if you have a more dispersed workforce at stations. How are you addressing those concerns, and how are you addressing some of the concerns from disability access groups that an automated help point does not suit everybody’s needs? Indeed, it is difficult to access—or even to find, if you have a disability such as sight loss or other issues.
It feels as if this is an unresolved issue. I have heard you making the business case on several occasions in public and private meetings that we have had, but there are still these unresolved issues and concerns. How are you taking those on and resolving them?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Thank you.