The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3036 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you think that the targets, as set out, will drive that joint working?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
What do you think that it means? Is the concern that people would spend a lot of time measuring things and not acting? I do not quite understand that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to go back to the issue of the topic areas that were effectively dropped by the Government throughout the consultation on and development of the bill. I want to get your reflections on why those specific areas were dropped. I guess you can argue that you can approach mainstreaming in different ways, and Rob Brooker has already said that there is an element of incorporating that into the issue of environmental conditions as well. However, I am interested in some of the other areas, such as investment. There is no target for investment. Why do you think that the Government has decided to draw the line under the targets for areas in the bill?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I accept the importance of a route to support neurodivergent young people in school that is not dependent on a diagnosis. However, will the minister accept that there are young people who urgently need a diagnosis? I raise the case of Archie from Kinross, whose parents have been knocked back three times by NHS Tayside for a CAMHS referral. They have spent thousands of pounds on a private assessment, and he now has a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Archie’s medical professionals believe that he would benefit from trial medication that would come with an ADHD diagnosis, but he would have to wait 10 years to receive a diagnosis in Tayside and he would probably be an adult before getting through the waiting list.
Will the minister acknowledge that there is a need for an urgent diagnostic pathway, particularly to support young people such as Archie and the thousands of people across Scotland who do not have a route to getting a diagnosis?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Government what pathways are available to obtain a child ADHD assessment for those who do not have a co-existing mental health disorder that meets the child and adolescent mental health services mental health criteria and who cannot afford a private assessment. (S6O-04620)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes, thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Does that concern you?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I sense that before the review that Colin Church did, there was not much in the way of planning for that capacity. His review mapped out the opportunities as well as some of the concerns. Do you get a sense that there is a plan for the strategic use of incineration in Scotland held by, presumably, the Government or local authorities working together, or anywhere really? Does anybody have a plan for 2028? What happens to redundant or excess incinerator capacity? How will it be managed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Looking across the EU at the even bigger picture, are there particular areas in which we are in complete alignment at the moment? Are there areas in which we are perhaps falling behind a bit? Where are we sitting on alignment? I presume that you have this conversation fairly regularly with Environmental Standards Scotland, which maintains the monitoring of alignment. I am interested to know where you think the dial is on alignment between us and Europe.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are there particular areas in which the work of Zero Waste Scotland is leading in the UK context? Are there any colleagues down south saying that there have been leads on particular issues—the deposit return scheme, say—that they can learn from?