The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2435 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
I think that the independent review recommended doing that. There might be a possibility of amending the standing orders of the Parliament in order to require that with bills more generally, that is, for both Government and members’ bills. I am interested in the Government’s journey to adopt net zero assessments. It has been a long journey, and we are still on it, but perhaps a natural next step is to apply it to legislation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you for your time. I would like to start by asking you whether you think the goal of 1.5ºC is still alive. Who would like to start?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is fine; I will continue with my questions.
For context, Gabi Hegerl, you are saying that there are only two or three years left of the budget to stay within 1.5°. Where are we with the peaking of global emissions? If we are to have any chance of staying within, say, 2° or 2.5°, when do global emissions need to peak, and what policies and actions need to be taken globally in order to have any chance of achieving that? Do you want to come in before I turn to others?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Just to be clear, this committee, and other committees, may make recommendations about the climate change plan, and the Government’s intention is to reflect on all the recommendations and finalise the plan ahead of the next election, so that there will be a cast-iron, agreed climate change plan. There will be nothing for the new Government to do in reopening that plan, and it will be tasked with delivering the actions that are in it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Will the exact balance of actions that the Government can take during the next five-year carbon budget be forthcoming in the climate change plan?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
You have rejected regulation. There is now a heavy reliance on the UK Government making decisions about the wholesale price of electricity, and other stuff may or may not happen. Will all those policy options be spelled out transparently in the energy strategy and the climate change plan, so that we can see what the impact will be?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
The emissions impact of the legislation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
Go ahead.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am reading the submission from the Institute for Public Policy Research in Scotland. It says that MSPs will have to decide to approve the carbon budgets
“effectively in ignorance of the policies they would then have to support in order to see the budgets delivered.”
The lack of information is concerning, and it perhaps plays to those, such as Mr Lumsden, who want to weaken ambition for the carbon budget, rather than people such as me, who want to strengthen that ambition.
No climate change plan—not even a draft one—has been submitted. We have only an incredibly thin indicative statement. The Government has rejected the advice of the UK Climate Change Committee on livestock and on peatlands, and policies on heat and on traffic reduction have been dropped. There is no energy strategy as yet. When it comes to Peterhead power station, there is uncertainty about the existing power station, let alone the prospect of a second one.
There are a lot of unknowns here and, quite frankly, I do not know whether this carbon budget is ambitious enough, because it lacks the transparency that successive committees of this Parliament have called for in advance of setting targets, objectives and aspirations around climate change. Although I will not vote against the budget, I find it very difficult to vote for it, because, without that detail, I do not know what it is that we are voting on at this point. I will therefore abstain.
12:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Mark Ruskell
We will be future proofing entry into those markets.