The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3015 contributions
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Will you be able to give a degree of certainty that you were not able to give last year?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
There will probably be no surprises next year.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
On a related point, your other accommodation costs for last year were 21 per cent over budget, so you clearly did not anticipate those costs. Can you explain what those costs were and why there was a significant increase?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to focus on the external quality review that the ICAEW conducted. I am aware that it looked at eight audits, five of which got a good bill of health. The other three, which were conducted by Audit Scotland’s in-house teams, included significant criticisms. Without repeating all the findings of those reviews, what were the reasons for those criticisms? What learning has taken place, and what actions have you put in place to weed out the organisations whose audits showed poor performance? We must bear in mind that only eight were looked at.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I feel as though there is a similar picture with travel and subsistence costs, in that further explanation is perhaps needed. Those costs amounted to £280,000, which was 69 per cent under budget. That is quite a significant underspend. Again, it feels as though there is a bit of a trend. In relation to what your expenditure will probably look like in the year ahead, I am trying to understand why you requested quite a big budget that was then underspent.
The wider context is that, later in the meeting, we will come on to areas in which you are overspending. The overall budget seems to have quite a lot of flex in relation to underspends and overspends, but what you requested for travel and subsistence costs was clearly not what was needed. What was the story behind travel and subsistence? Again, it felt as though we had quite a clear understanding of where you were going in that regard last year. The return to in-person meetings and audit work was quite tentative, so I am interested in the story behind the figures.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Good morning. I would like to focus on some of the variances in operating costs. On rent and rates, for 2024-25, you requested 54.4 per cent more than you spent, and you spent only 14 per cent more than you spent in 2023-24. I remember that, last year, you gave the commission some quite granular information about your property costs and your strategy for accommodation. I felt that we had a clear picture of that, but your budget request does not match up with what you have spent. It feels as though that is a trend and that we come back to the same point year after year. I hope that I am not being too unfair, but the figures are quite stark in showing that you do not spend what you ask for. I am trying to understand the reasons for that trend.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
You also mentioned systemic issues. Were any such issues identified through the scores of three that revealed poor quality?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on its discussions with the United Kingdom Government regarding the asylum right to work pilot proposal, in light of the Home Office reportedly stating that it is unable to commit to exploring the feasibility of the proposal. (S6O-04824)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, further to the response to question S6O-04050, what the findings were of the review of the terms and conditions of staff employed by MSPs, particularly in relation to parental leave policies. (S6O-04832)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I thank the member for the confirmation that work is under way.
I attended the dad strike that took place outside Parliament last week. It was a great event that brought together families from across Scotland who are concerned about the lack of parental leave policies—particularly paternity leave policies—more widely in society. I talked to them about the arrangements in Parliament and the fact that, as MSPs, we have provision in our budgets to enable fathers and non-birthing partners to take only two weeks of paternity leave or partner leave. I felt a bit embarrassed about that because although I know that the law says two weeks, I think that public institutions such as the Parliament can and should go a lot further than that. I reflect on my own experiences of having only two weeks after the birth of my two sons, and it is just not enough.
This is the time for the Parliament to lead corporately on the issue and to show leadership. I accept the member’s point that the intention and hope is to have something more all-encompassing in place by the start of the next parliamentary session, but I reiterate that it would be really good for members to have a bit more certainty and an update on that. This is a fantastic place for people to work, but it could be a wee bit better if we had—