Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 30 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3015 contributions

|

Meeting of the Commission

Audit Scotland Annual Report and Accounts for the year to 31 March 2025 and Auditor’s Report on the Accounts

Meeting date: 23 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

Will you be able to give a degree of certainty that you were not able to give last year?

Meeting of the Commission

Audit Scotland Annual Report and Accounts for the year to 31 March 2025 and Auditor’s Report on the Accounts

Meeting date: 23 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

There will probably be no surprises next year.

Meeting of the Commission

Audit Scotland Annual Report and Accounts for the year to 31 March 2025 and Auditor’s Report on the Accounts

Meeting date: 23 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

On a related point, your other accommodation costs for last year were 21 per cent over budget, so you clearly did not anticipate those costs. Can you explain what those costs were and why there was a significant increase?

Meeting of the Commission

“Quality of public audit in Scotland: Annual report 2024/25”

Meeting date: 23 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

I want to focus on the external quality review that the ICAEW conducted. I am aware that it looked at eight audits, five of which got a good bill of health. The other three, which were conducted by Audit Scotland’s in-house teams, included significant criticisms. Without repeating all the findings of those reviews, what were the reasons for those criticisms? What learning has taken place, and what actions have you put in place to weed out the organisations whose audits showed poor performance? We must bear in mind that only eight were looked at.

Meeting of the Commission

Audit Scotland Annual Report and Accounts for the year to 31 March 2025 and Auditor’s Report on the Accounts

Meeting date: 23 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

I feel as though there is a similar picture with travel and subsistence costs, in that further explanation is perhaps needed. Those costs amounted to £280,000, which was 69 per cent under budget. That is quite a significant underspend. Again, it feels as though there is a bit of a trend. In relation to what your expenditure will probably look like in the year ahead, I am trying to understand why you requested quite a big budget that was then underspent.

The wider context is that, later in the meeting, we will come on to areas in which you are overspending. The overall budget seems to have quite a lot of flex in relation to underspends and overspends, but what you requested for travel and subsistence costs was clearly not what was needed. What was the story behind travel and subsistence? Again, it felt as though we had quite a clear understanding of where you were going in that regard last year. The return to in-person meetings and audit work was quite tentative, so I am interested in the story behind the figures.

Meeting of the Commission

Audit Scotland Annual Report and Accounts for the year to 31 March 2025 and Auditor’s Report on the Accounts

Meeting date: 23 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

Good morning. I would like to focus on some of the variances in operating costs. On rent and rates, for 2024-25, you requested 54.4 per cent more than you spent, and you spent only 14 per cent more than you spent in 2023-24. I remember that, last year, you gave the commission some quite granular information about your property costs and your strategy for accommodation. I felt that we had a clear picture of that, but your budget request does not match up with what you have spent. It feels as though that is a trend and that we come back to the same point year after year. I hope that I am not being too unfair, but the figures are quite stark in showing that you do not spend what you ask for. I am trying to understand the reasons for that trend.

Meeting of the Commission

“Quality of public audit in Scotland: Annual report 2024/25”

Meeting date: 23 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

You also mentioned systemic issues. Were any such issues identified through the scores of three that revealed poor quality?

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on its discussions with the United Kingdom Government regarding the asylum right to work pilot proposal, in light of the Home Office reportedly stating that it is unable to commit to exploring the feasibility of the proposal. (S6O-04824)

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Question Time

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, further to the response to question S6O-04050, what the findings were of the review of the terms and conditions of staff employed by MSPs, particularly in relation to parental leave policies. (S6O-04832)

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Question Time

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

I thank the member for the confirmation that work is under way.

I attended the dad strike that took place outside Parliament last week. It was a great event that brought together families from across Scotland who are concerned about the lack of parental leave policies—particularly paternity leave policies—more widely in society. I talked to them about the arrangements in Parliament and the fact that, as MSPs, we have provision in our budgets to enable fathers and non-birthing partners to take only two weeks of paternity leave or partner leave. I felt a bit embarrassed about that because although I know that the law says two weeks, I think that public institutions such as the Parliament can and should go a lot further than that. I reflect on my own experiences of having only two weeks after the birth of my two sons, and it is just not enough.

This is the time for the Parliament to lead corporately on the issue and to show leadership. I accept the member’s point that the intention and hope is to have something more all-encompassing in place by the start of the next parliamentary session, but I reiterate that it would be really good for members to have a bit more certainty and an update on that. This is a fantastic place for people to work, but it could be a wee bit better if we had—