The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2921 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
Where workplace parking levies have been introduced, they have raised millions and millions of pounds for public transport and active travel investment, but is there a requirement on councils to invest in those types of priorities?
The measure points to local transport strategies. Investment priorities for those strategies could be broader than just investment in active travel and public transport, so can we get a reassurance that the money that is raised will be invested in the solutions that people need to get them out of cars in the first place?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
I will ask briefly about biodiversity and national infrastructure. There is a commitment in NPF4 on local nature networks. I think that the understanding is that every local authority will develop its own local nature network. I will start with Bruce Wilson. What is the difference between that and having a national nature network in respect of its status in planning? What is the difference between that and what you are looking for in the NPF?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
You are talking about co-ordination. I am imagining a catchment such as the Forth, multiple local authorities, maybe different landscape initiatives, and different ecological networks. I am trying to get my head around what the qualitative difference is in defining that as a national development in NPF4. The Government could turn around and say, “We’ll make sure there is co-ordination, but we don’t really need this as a national development.” What does a national development bring? The CSGN, for example, has been a national development.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
Dr Brown, do you have a perspective on what is currently spelled out as a national development for walking, wheeling and cycling?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
I want to ask about the bigger picture. We have NPF4, the strategic transport projects review—which has just been announced—the national transport strategy and the budget. Are those all properly aligned? Do they respect the transport hierarchy, or are there some differences or misalignment? I ask Paul White to answer first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
In the past, Transform Scotland has been somewhat critical of Scottish Government budgets in relation to the transport hierarchy and whether what is in the NTS materialises when it comes to spending the cash. Dr Brown, what is your thinking on those critical strategies and capital programmes and on whether they align?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
My final question is about delivery and the mechanisms that we have for that. My local authority in Stirling has a plan for what it wants to deliver but it is taking a long time to roll it out. Some of that is down to traffic regulation orders and the traffic system. Are there particular barriers that you would point to that could brush up against the ambition of NPF4? I put that to Chiquita Elvin, who is directly involved in rolling out the tarmac, on the ground.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
Do Caroline Brown and David Hunter have any final thoughts on the issue?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
Does Rosie Simpson want to come in on that before I move on to a different topic?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Mark Ruskell
Would you expect that, in any consultation on the introduction of a workplace parking levy, the public would be consulted on their priorities? Would they be able to see that there are alternatives coming down the track and that they will not be lumped with paying the charges for ever, because there will be investment in alternatives?