Seòmar agus comataidhean

For years, Greens have highlighted how the relentless growth of aviation is wrecking the climate, so I warmly welcome that major shift from the Scottish Government, which is a recognition, based on science, that aviation demand will have to fall if we are to have any chance of meeting climate targets. Does the minister agree with me that domestic mainland flights often undermine demand for intercity rail services and that that must be factored into the forthcoming aviation strategy?

Okay. I will give way.

I thank Labour colleagues for bringing this debate. It is important that we thank the workers for their commitment to delivering rail services during the pandemic, and it is important that we push Abellio to get round the table with our unions and resolve the industrial dispute well ahead of COP26.

The motion references world car free day, which is a reminder of why we urgently need to transform our transport system. If we do not get the system right, the 70 per cent of people who have access to a car will simply drive more, while the people who do not have access to cars will be even further disadvantaged.

Rail must be at the heart of the Government’s plan for a 20 per cent reduction in traffic. The transfer of ScotRail into public ownership next year must mark a relaunch of rail in Scotland and a genuine people’s railway. We must have a service that is run in the public interest, with a direct role for passengers and workers in service planning and delivery, so that we reach out to communities who are currently not served by the rail network and to passengers who—let us be honest—could be served a lot better.

I am concerned that the focus of the Docherty report and the subsequent ScotRail timetable proposals is on service cuts and facility closures across Scotland’s rail network, rather than on changes that can genuinely create room for expansion and improvement of services. In the report, it was claimed that the recommendations were due to changed passenger behaviour and the need for economic recovery from Covid but, as members said, it is still too early to say how rail use will recover post-pandemic, given that many workplaces have, understandably, yet to invite workers fully back to the office.

ScotRail is currently consulting on its national proposed timetable and the consultation closes for responses on 1 October.

I do not think that I have time in hand—or do I, Presiding Officer?

No, and I will tell the member what I am doing to listen to the travelling public and channel their comments to the minister and to ScotRail. I have been active in encouraging constituents across my region to make their voices heard. More than 300 people have engaged with the consultation portal that I set up and have told ScotRail what they think of the cuts. ScotRail confirmed to me today that it will attend a town hall event next week, which I am organising online, to explain the timetable changes to people and hear directly from passengers across my region about how the changes will affect them. People have a voice and they are having their say on the issue.

How ScotRail deals with the responses to the consultation will be a big test. We expect full transparency about the concerns that are raised and the action that it will take to address them before it passes on final proposals to the minister for a decision.

I acknowledge that some change will be necessary. No one wants to see empty trains running, and the rail network must be used efficiently. There might be timetable changes that meet passenger demand better than the current timetable does.

However, the changes that we have seen so far are concerning. For example, the Kirkcaldy to Perth service will take up to 30 minutes longer, with no direct train between the two places and less frequent journeys. Journeys in Fife will require a change at Inverkeithing, which will increase journey times. Passengers in Strathearn might benefit from more regular services from Gleneagles, but for Perth residents the current problems with journey times will be compounded. If the message is that it will become harder to take the train between Perth and Scotland’s other cities, that will be incredibly damaging to the Government’s target of securing a 20 per cent reduction in vehicle mileage.

I hope that the minister will listen to passengers—I am sure that he will do so—and to the workers. We look forward to the successful relaunch of a people’s railway next year.

Does HIE have a perspective? There has been discussion about, for example, a marine coastal national park. Is that on your radar?

Will you clarify whether you are able to work across sectors and not exclusively in the private sector? Are you able to work with public companies and social enterprises? We have great examples of public companies delivering heat, such as Aberdeen Heat & Power, and I know that local councils are interested in that space of delivering heat networks and local heat to communities. Can they get support from enterprise agencies to do that or are there restrictions on the agencies’ remits? Are you working across sectors?

I was struck by Andy McDonald’s earlier comments about the challenge with heat decarbonisation. It is enormously challenging: 1,000,000 homes will have to be decarbonised by 2030 in order to meet Government targets. Perhaps you can give us a bit more background on how you see the skills gap in heat decarbonisation being filled.

In addition, I would like to know more about the relationship between the enterprise agencies and the new public energy agency that will be launched. How will delivery work, in that regard? How will we develop supply chains and deliver at a scale that has never previously been seen in Scotland?

My next question is for SOSE and HIE. There is a commitment in the co-operation agreement between my party and the Scottish Government to develop at least one national park by the end of this parliamentary session. What are your perspectives on that? Can we learn any lessons from the existing national parks on the job opportunities that might come from that?

Will you work with campaigns in the south of Scotland to develop a prospectus for a national park, or is that outwith your remit?