The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3723 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I want to go back to the issue of community benefit for windfarms. When a lot of the windfarms were being developed in the early noughties, the community benefit payment levels were set quite low. Sometimes, the level is set at around £1,000 a megawatt. Some of those windfarms are seeking to expand or they are repowering. Is that an opportunity to dramatically increase the amount of money that communities are getting per megawatt from those projects as they seek to expand and become more efficient?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
The ambition of an extra 12GW is huge, so the potential benefit to communities is huge as well, regardless of whether that is through ownership or, indeed, through a smaller amount of money coming through a community benefit payment.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
On the supply chain, I have heard feedback from parts of the renewable energy industry that, although there are strong targets and a strong ambition in the energy strategy and just transition plan, there is perhaps not a clear pathway towards development of the supply chain or a clear focus on which bits of the supply chain that we want to develop. Might that come on the back of the energy strategy and just transition plan, or are you looking at changing that as a result of the consultation and feedback? I am trying to work out where the issue of supply chain development sits. The Japanese announcement is incredibly welcome, but where does that sit within a wider plan for a supply chain for the offshore industry?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
The flip side is that, if blue carbon was brought into the inventory, that might affect the targets but it might also provide solutions, such as blue carbon marine protected areas and seagrass or kelp restoration. As well as having to account for an entirely new part of our biosphere in our thinking on the inventory, that might open up opportunities for progress.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I want to go back to hydrogen to explore the Government’s vision for that. We have targets in the energy strategy, for 5GW of hydrogen by 2030 and 25GW by 2045. I want to get a sense of where you see that generation coming from and the mix of blue hydrogen versus green hydrogen, or the transition to green hydrogen. Where do you see the 5GW of capacity coming from and how can that shift over time?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I guess that the blue hydrogen would come from Grangemouth and maybe on-site generation at Mossmorran. Beyond that and the Acorn project cluster, are we looking at green hydrogen going forward?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
The Tories’ Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill is not only a failure of statecraft but an attempt to systematically dismantle the state and, with it, the protections and rights that Britain helped to create during our decades of membership of the European Union. There are some welcome signs that the UK Government may be forced to weaken its approach to throwing EU laws over the cliff edge in December, but are there particular portfolios where the threat of a race to the bottom in standards still hangs over Scotland?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I am interested to know to what extent, over the two-year process, there has been a different conversation in local communities about funding? Have discussions been galvanised about a transient visitor levy, 1 per cent for culture or funding from other sources? Is that embedding itself into future partnerships and future funding sources, or is it still embryonic? The momentum that you built up has to go somewhere. If, fundamentally, it is about funding and commitment over time, what are the areas that the community and peer-to-peer networks are trying to push forward? Are they trying to move the conversation on at local level about how things will be supported?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I am happy to allow the discussion to move on.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I have a lot of questions about how to sustain what has been created and how to develop the partnerships that have been established by the various projects and make them sustainable for the long term. It seems as though the Culture Collective has seeded all that work in the communities, but how do you then build the network for the long term and get partners in that network to feed into it, recognise its long-term value and move beyond that period of great creativity and innovation that has lasted for the six months or two years? Ultimately, the need is there, the benefit is there and the commitment to communities is there, and expectations will have also been raised. Where do you go next?