Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 5 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3036 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

I can certainly see how that element—that is, how the individual knew the person in question or recognised that the dog was an assistance dog—would be a central part of the consideration of such a case.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

Theft of assistance dogs is incredibly rare, but the committee has had evidence from the Law Society of Scotland and the Crown Office that its impact can be taken into consideration in sentencing. What is your response to that evidence?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

I will direct this question initially to Emily Johns. It is about what really needs to be fixed. You described the two separate, although related, regimes of environmental outcome reports and the regime that we have here for onshore infrastructure. What changes, if any, would you like the bill to make to the EIA legislation and the habitats regulations? Does the system that we have at the moment broadly work in facilitating development, as Caroline McParland suggested?

The view of the Government is that we are really going to struggle to meet our offshore wind ambitions without some changes, but I am struggling to see what the changes should be and where the good practice is in the UK or in other regimes. I know that you are not here to speak for the entire renewable energy industry—it is a shame that we do not have anybody here from Scottish Renewables or that sector—but perhaps you can attempt to field that question.

10:45  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

Caroline, do you want to come in on that question as well?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

My next question follows on from that, because the purposes for which the proposed power can be used, which are outlined in sections 3(a) to 3(f), are extremely broad. Under section 3(c), it can be used

“to ensure consistency or compatibility with other legal regimes”.

Emily Johns has already mentioned the regime under the Electricity Act 1989. I am interested in any other views on that. When it comes to environmental assessment and the habitats regulations, what would be an ideal system? Can we get a view from the property and housing sector?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

Basically, does the system work for you in facilitating economic growth?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

I would like to hear how, from your perspective, the proposed powers could be used in a way that would be beneficial. We are trying to understand how the powers might be used and how you might wish to have them used. In England, there is a lot of discussion about the changing regimes and the indication that the Government there has given about how it is going to change things. Do you have anything to add on that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth (Project Willow)

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

Yes. I have a quick question. Tim Dumenil mentioned Mossmorran. How do you see Mossmorran potentially fitting in with the hydrogen options from project willow?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth (Project Willow)

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

I think that Professor Andresen was talking about CHP systems that were set up on the back of existing industrial sites, which is quite a niche application.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth (Project Willow)

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Mark Ruskell

Yes. I will bring in Tim Dumenil in a second, but I was struck by something that Lewis Elder said earlier. The potential demand for all the project willow projects would be around 20GW of generation to do the electrolysis and create the hydrogen.

Does that conflict with what you said earlier about blending hydrogen into the gas grid? If we have the demand for a huge amount of power to produce as hydrogen—and potentially we cannot meet all the projects that could be developed through project willow—why would we then want to put it into the gas grid? Surely we should focus the hydrogen production on two or three applications coming out of project willow. Are you making the case for blending hydrogen into the gas grid as a way of pump priming things? If you are, how do you get out of that to use the hydrogen where you really want to put it, which might be in a fertiliser factory or some other form of derivative manufacture where you do not have any alternative but to use hydrogen because electric will not cut it? Does that make sense?