The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2435 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
It is a full cost recovery model.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you think that there are isolated examples of bad practice that have tarred the industry with the same brush?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I very much welcome that this SSI has been introduced—it is the final SSI in a suite of regulations that are needed to introduce franchising. However, a number of questions arise from this and previous SSIs that need to be answered.
When the previous SSI came to the committee, the Government committed to getting back to us with more information about the guidance that would be produced. I do not think that we have seen that yet, so it would be useful if we could write to the Government to ask it where the guidance on franchising is.
It would also be useful to ask about the timescale for implementation. I am aware that Strathclyde Partnership for Transport might be making a decision in September about whether to go down the franchising route, so I would be concerned about any delay in the production of guidance delaying that process. We are already quite delayed in Scotland compared with many of the mayoral authorities in England that have already taken advantage of the legal changes there and have gone down a franchising and municipalisation route. More information from the Scottish Government on that would be useful.
I am also aware that SPT has raised a range of concerns about the risks that are associated with the suite of franchising regulations. It would be good to reflect those concerns in a letter to the Government and to get a response from it on those concerns at this point, given that SPT is preparing for a potential decision to go down that route in September.
I feel that there are a couple of loose ends that it would be worth this committee following up on with the Government—its commitment to us on guidance and our raising with it a few of the concerns that have come out of SPT’s considerations.
Beyond that, I am happy for the instrument to come into effect and that we have the legal basis to allow bids for franchising to be developed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in how the exclusion of glass affects the overall economics of the deposit and return scheme and in the impact on local authorities. Can we start with the first of those? How does the exclusion of glass impact on the economics of the DRS?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I would like to get a bit of clarity on where you see the environmental outcomes reports and the existing EIA system applying? If, for example, there were consents for onshore transmission infrastructure under sections 36 or 37 of the Electricity Act 1989, would they now go through the Westminster system of EORs, or would it be expected that EIAs will still apply?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
So, there will be two systems?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
You mentioned earlier the environmental outcomes and the increased emissions from not including glass in the system, so we do not need to dwell on that.
Wales is going ahead with including glass. I think that you said that that is primarily because Wales has a very high recycling rate and sees this as a way to drive it to the next level. How will the Welsh scheme be interoperable with the scheme that Scotland will now be part of? Are there discussions about how that interoperability will work and about the internal market act implications of the regulations in Wales? That is pertinent to the discussions that we had in Scotland a couple of years ago. Can Wales actually go ahead with this? Will it work with the scheme that you are now signed up to?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
If Wales is granted an internal market act exemption, it will be somewhat bittersweet for you and for the Scottish Government, but would it provide a route for you to come back at some point and include glass within a UK and Scottish scheme?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Can I pick up on the council issue before you bring Haydn Thomas in? My understanding is that the inclusion of glass in the DRS would have meant that many councils could have wound down or reduced their kerbside recycling operations and saved money as a result. Are you expecting any changes due to councils having to maintain glass recycling—at a cost to them, because they do not make a profit from it—as a result of glass not being included? I am interested in where the cost will arise. Will it come to local authorities or will the extended producer responsibility kick in, with local authorities getting money for running such schemes? They will still have to collect and deal with what is a bulky, expensive and difficult-to-handle material.