The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2921 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Yes, thank you, convener.
It has been a very interesting and enlightening evidence session, and I have just a couple of quick questions. First, one situation highlighted in the report is of greyhounds living and being trained in Scotland but going to race in England, where there is more of a greyhound racing industry. In that scenario, you have recommended independent regulation. Can you explain the Scottish Government’s powers in relation to that aspect of regulation? We have not touched on that yet.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
You also conclude that a phasing out of greyhound racing would be desirable. How do you think that would work, and what is the difference between phasing it out and an outright ban?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
On the TNUOS review, is it accepted that the locational signals need to change? As far as I can see, the aim with locational signalling at the moment is to build as much generation as possible as close as possible to the theoretical centre of the GB energy market, which I think is Warwick. Last time I looked, building renewable energy close to Warwick was not going to produce as big an efficiency and load factor as building renewables in Scotland. We get more energy out of wind farms in Scotland than we would in the midlands of England. Is it recognised that locational signals need to change now through TNUOS, and that we need to be accessing and developing the resource where it is?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
As you said, it is a transitionary period, which is par for the course with many other DRS schemes. However, if there was a grace period for small producers in the middle of that, what complexity would it cause? For example, if some small distilleries are in the scheme and some are not, a convenience store might have a complex shelf of regional whiskies, with some being in the scheme and some being out of it. How will that work? I appreciate Mr Harris’s point that larger retailers might just say, “Forget this—it’s too much”. What other issues might the grace period create for small producers and those in retail and wholesale?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
That is one area. Are there others?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
But—[Inaudible.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Thanks for that. I have another couple of questions on this.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
It is good to see you in front of the committee, minister. I will turn to some of the concerns of environmental stakeholders and how you have addressed those in discussions within the common framework process and come to the decisions that you have, collectively. One of those concerns is around divergence during this delay period.
I understand that the EU is considering, and has taken the first steps towards, phasing out 47 groups of chemicals under its regime but that, under the UK REACH scheme, the UK is considering only three groups in that first phase of considering the environmental health impact of chemicals and how quickly they can be phased out. Do you see the potential for divergence, given the deadlines and the lack of pace of the UK scheme?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
However, the example that I pointed to is a live one. Forty-seven groups of chemicals are going through the process of being phased out in the EU, but only three groups are going through that process in the UK system. Therefore, how does the alternative model of UK REACH ensure that we do not have that divergence going forward? That seems to be a live case of divergence that is already creeping in to the system. How will the model ensure that, as we understand more about chemicals and their health and environmental impacts, decisions can be made more quickly to get them on the path to being phased out?