The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2999 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Do you acknowledge that that will damage jazz?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Your linear programme “Jazz Nights” is a long-standing slot; it has been there for years. It influenced Tommy Smith and many others. That is on BBC Sounds, so it is available. I imagine that you could do more to promote that.
Let us imagine that you are an aspiring young jazz musician who has spent hundreds, if not thousands, of hours improving your skills and are about to make that breakthrough. You could enter the competition that the BBC intends to set up and get some exposure through that, but where do you go then? If there is nowhere to play your music, if you are restricted to one tiny slot on the afternoon show, if there is no specialist Scottish jazz programme on the BBC any more and if your ability to get on to BBC Radio 2 and BBC Radio 3 programmes is highly constrained, where do you take that? I can see that you are nurturing talent up to a certain level, but you are then cutting away the platform where they can get exposure, raise their profile and go on to develop their career. Where is the progression if you are a young Scottish jazz artist?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Let us just get this clear: will cutting “Jazz Nights” mean more or less airtime for young, emerging Scottish talent in the jazz scene?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
But is it more or less?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
To come back to my fundamental question: will there be more or less airtime for Scottish jazz talent as a result of your cutting “Jazz Nights” and the reforms that you have proposed?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Right. Thank you: there will be less airtime for Scottish jazz as a result of that.
What expertise do you have in commissioning across the three genres to which you propose to make changes and cuts? What kind of musical expertise do you, as commissioners, have in those areas?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Right, but you do not have specific skills in those musical genres. I suppose that my question is this: do you understand those musical genres, how important they are and the educational aspect for the listening public—the importance of having a curated show that takes the listener on a journey to understand that musical genre?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Good morning. I start by asking whether you think that the Sewel convention should be more binding in its effect. The committee has heard evidence that there might be practical ways to achieve that. My colleague mentioned the definition of the word “normally” in the Scotland Act 1998, for example. There could be greater certainty regarding the conditions under which Westminster could override refusal of consent. There could be a body to consider or report on a justification for overriding, or there could be a requirement for affirmative support in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Those are among the ideas that have been put to us.
I wonder whether that is a matter to which you feel greater attention needs to be paid. What are your thoughts on those types of reforms and are you thinking about others?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Just to be clear, are you saying, from the Welsh perspective, that it would be useful to codify that in legislation—I presume through the Wales Act 2017?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Finally, can I get a perspective from Mr Wragg?