Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 11 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2695 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 24 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

Next week, I will host an online summit with my constituents to discuss the future of bus services, and I would be happy to share the results of that with the minister. Does the minister believe that the regulator currently has enough powers to hold the bus companies to account over minimum standards of services?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Scottish Water (Annual Report and Accounts 2021-22)

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

Of the discharges that you know are happening, and which you recognise are problematic and are therefore monitoring, what proportion are deliberate and what proportion are accidental discharges?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Scottish Water (Annual Report and Accounts 2021-22)

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

So it is totally dependent on rainfall—there is no control over it. You cannot predict when there is going to be a flow from the combined sewer overflows, because it is all dependent on rainfall.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Scottish Water (Annual Report and Accounts 2021-22)

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

I am sorry to interrupt you. I am aware of the local geography and everything else; I think that the issues are with the main flow. The general point is around compliance. If SEPA writes you a letter like that, what do you do? Do you say, “Well, there’s actually still a problem here, but we have to put it into the investment programme over time,” or do you jump and take action on the—

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Scottish Water (Annual Report and Accounts 2021-22)

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

Good morning. I want to raise the issue of sewage discharge, which has been very high in the public’s mind this year. It does not appear that there is a clear picture on sewage discharge in Scotland. That point was made by Environmental Standards Scotland in its recent sector baseline evidence review, so I have a number of questions about what that picture is in Scotland.

At the moment, only 3 per cent of combined sewer overflows are monitored. Is that enough to get a clear picture?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Scottish Water (Annual Report and Accounts 2021-22)

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

It might be useful for the committee to get evidence on the work programme on a third of CSOs, including the investment for that and how the work will be scheduled.

I move briefly on to a related issue, which is water quality. Douglas Millican said earlier that Scotland’s water quality is excellent. Despite that, however, Environmental Standards Scotland, as part of its sector review, highlighted the fact that a number of the river basin management plan targets have been missed, and that we still have an issue with barriers to fish and lamprey migration, along with a number of other issues relating to the operation of Scottish Water assets.

How do you prioritise environmental compliance? I give you the example of Loch Venachar. I am aware that SEPA wrote you a letter last month confirming that four of your fish passes, not on the side channel but on the main channel, are not compliant with your permit. You are in effect acting outwith your permit conditions—in other words, you are operating illegally. How seriously do you take environmental compliance?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

It is clear that the regulations are about resourcing the applications system in a better way, and I note the move to full cost recovery. The question is: what will they do to performance? According to evidence that the industry has given the committee, it can take seven years for an application to be determined. The whole system is very slow, whether it be applications going to councils, going to the planning division of planning or going through the system of environmental appeals in the Scottish Government. Will these regulations make a significant difference to those timescales for determination? We are in a climate emergency, and we need business certainty. Applications need to be approved or rejected on a reasonable timescale, so will the regulations properly resource the decision-making structure and process?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Scottish Water (Annual Report and Accounts 2021-22)

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

It is a slightly different question, convener. I will be very quick. I want to ask Johanna Dow about the privatised market for the billing and sale of water to business customers. Do you feel that that is working? Have there been efficiencies? Could you operate just as effectively as a state monopoly?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Scottish Water (Annual Report and Accounts 2021-22)

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

That is useful context but, to come back to the question, I asked you specifically about the figure of 3 per cent. Is that enough? Do you have a figure for how many combined sewer overflows you should be monitoring in order to capture that environmental impact and to understand it?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Scottish Water (Annual Report and Accounts 2021-22)

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Mark Ruskell

You have given me a proportion there—you said that you will move towards introducing monitoring on a third of overflows. What about the two thirds that are not monitored? Are you saying that those are not problematic? How do you know that they are not?