The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2695 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
To what extent is SEPA able or willing to make such recommendations? If you see that improvements are needed to local authority waste collection or that there needs to be more of an emphasis on the producer, how confident do you feel, as the regulator enacting and upholding the regulations, that you are able to make that case? Are you reliant on Environmental Standards Scotland and others to come to conclusions about what needs to change, because, ultimately, that is not your role?
When SEPA has given evidence to the committee in the past, I have felt a reluctance on your part to talk about whether the regulations or the laws are actually fit for purpose, perhaps because you do not see that as your role. However, I am just going to push the boundaries today and see what you are prepared to say. After all, this kind of waste is a very visible problem in Scotland, and I am interested to know how you will fix it. Indeed, you have given an inkling of that already.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
You mentioned a commitment to deliver a pilot for a cap on bus fares. You said that the areas have not yet been chosen, but is that the tone of the conversation with the industry? I know that that will be only a pilot and that it will not be nationwide, but it could be significant if the companies also actually invest in opportunities in those areas.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay—so there is active work to develop a new code of practice for agriculture in relation to ammonia?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I go back to Mossmorran then, which has been in the system for years and is with the procurator fiscal. What is the communication with the surrounding community? Is it a matter of, “Job done, the operators have already invested in the site, therefore not a problem,” or is the expectation that some form of action would still take place that SEPA would support in court? It feels like a lot of those issues kind of drift off to the procurator fiscal and then it is difficult for folks to see where the follow-up action is.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes, okay.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I did not ask for a comparator with other parts of the UK. I want to know, on the best evidence that we have, whether the current standards are adequate to deliver a healthy environment.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Your question was useful, convener.
I want to ask about issues with electrical and battery waste, at Friarton in Perth in particular, where we have seen four fires under the site’s successive owners. We have seen similar fires at other waste management sites around Scotland, too. I suppose that that touches on elements of fire safety, which are potentially outwith SEPA’s remit; as with salmon farming, you share regulation of the sites with other bodies.
I just wanted to get your reflections on that, though, because what the public are seeing are the same sites and the same fires, time after time. It would be useful to know whether you believe that the regulatory framework that you work under is enough at the moment to tackle not only those huge pollution incidents but the elements of risk that workers at the sites and local communities face? It seems that we are seeing a vast increase in the amount of battery waste in society, and there are perhaps questions to ask about whether that will be regulated effectively, given that we do not seem to fully understand the risks around fires and other such issues.
Nicole, did you want to come back in on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
If you have more detail on the status of those conversations, specifically in relation to the WHO guidelines, that would be useful.
On greenhouse gases and ammonia, the CAFS strategy says that you have been working with
“the agricultural industry to develop a voluntary code of good agricultural practice for improving air quality in Scotland.”
You are directly involved in that CAFS workstream. I am interested in what progress you have made towards developing that code, who has been involved in that development and whether you think that a voluntary code is the right way forward or whether we should be moving towards using regulation—or a mixture of both.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
It would be useful for the committee to see any update that you have in relation to how you have adopted those ESS recommendations in a timely manner, if we have missed it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
You wanted to come in on this matter, convener. I have another question after that.