The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2999 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
Iain, when you came to the committee at this time last year, you were looking at that £6.6 million cut. The impression that I got from you at the time was that it would not make a massive difference to RFOs in this year. The concern was really about the next year—2024-25—and whether those cuts would continue. Is that still the case, despite the chaotic situation that you are now in, with reinstatement and having to dip into the reserves again? Is the issue still what the impact might be on the 2024-25 budget?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
Okay. I have a couple of questions for Isabel Davis, too. How have in-year budget revisions impacted the work of Screen Scotland? Separate from that—although, in some ways, it might be linked—is the memorandum of understanding that I believe you have with a range of partner organisations, including Scottish Enterprise. How does that process work? Is it effective? Does it provide opportunities for, say, more direct funding of Screen Scotland?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
I am aware of the time. It has been a really enlightening evidence session, and I have loads of questions, but I will focus on just one.
I was aware that, in the submissions, there was a lot of reflection on the transient visitor levy. It is clear that you see that as an opportunity to invest in culture. However, the point was made that, in these straitened times for local authority budgets, councils might just spend that money on meeting their statutory duties rather than in discretionary spending on culture. My question is therefore how you think ring fencing could proceed.
11:15I then want to ask whether you have any comments on the late confirmation of grant in aid budget. That has been a theme of this morning’s evidence from Creative Scotland. If that is being reflected across the sector, has it caused issues with delay in the budget that has come in?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
Is it the case that those agencies maintain and hold those budgets to which you then have to apply, or do the budgets come straight to Screen Scotland?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
What does Audit Scotland say about your reserves? Has it offered you any guidance or analysis about the level of reserves that you have?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
I understand.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
Yesterday’s decision by the United Kingdom Government to grant a licence to the Rosebank oil and gas field is nothing short of a climate catastrophe, condemning us to a future dependent on fossil fuels while the planet around us burns. It shows utter contempt for our environment and the future generations who will live with the consequences. Will the First Minister join me in condemning this decision, and can he say whether the UK Government carried out the necessary climate compatibility assessment before the licence was granted?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
I welcome the statement, and the onshore wind sector deal in particular, which, as the minister has alluded to, is at the heart of the Bute house agreement. It looks as though, through that deal, there will be a doubling of onshore wind capacity in Scotland, which means that many of our existing wind farms will need to be repowered or extended. That could provide the opportunity to renegotiate community benefit payments, which for many existing wind farms are at quite a low level—the payments are only around £1,000 a megawatt for many wind farms in my constituency.
Are there opportunities to maximise community benefit payments through renegotiation, so that we can get transformative investment in communities—for example, in housing, as the minister mentioned to Dr Allan—which we really need from renewable energy developments across Scotland?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
Transport remains Scotland’s most polluting and highest-emitting sector. An investigation by The Scotsman revealed that more than 1,500 empty or nearly empty commercial passenger flights, which are also known as ghost flights, passed through Scottish airports last year. That must change.
Does the cabinet secretary agree with the Oxfam report’s recommendations on the use of taxation to reduce air travel demand? What is her view on implementing a higher tax for more polluting aircraft, such as private jets?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the recommendations regarding taxation policy in Oxfam GB’s analysis, “Payment Overdue: Fair ways to make polluters across the UK pay for climate justice”. (S6O-02561)