The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2921 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
I know, but it is the same point, and he could have answered it by now.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
I will pick up the pace, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is solar in it? Will solar feature?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Let us turn now to the consenting process. We are talking about projects of more than 50MW, which means the involvement of the energy consents unit. I am aware that the ECU has increased its staff capacity, and there was a commitment to reduce the time that it takes to make judgments on consents. Has that had an impact? Are there still significant delays for projects of more than 50MW, or are there signs of the system picking up while, at the same time, maintaining the important involvement of communities and stakeholders in contributing to evidence taking?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Coming back to the climate change plan and the assumptions in it on the roll-out of renewables and the electrification of society in the years leading up to 2045, do you think that the architecture of consenting processes, responsibilities over transmission charging and so on align with the CCP? Are the assumptions in the CCP solid, based on our current planning and consenting architecture, or are there any challenges coming up? Are the assumptions around how much generation capacity we can bring in over the next 10 or 15 years going to stand up, given our situation right now with markets, planning and the rest of it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Sure. I will probably target this more towards Matthew and Gemma. Should different technologies, such as solar, be required to pay out at a different level, depending on the economics?
With regard to wind farm repowering and life extension, do some of those historical community benefit deals, which were set at maybe £1,000 per megawatt, need to be revisited, perhaps with a £5,000 per megawatt rate or whatever is the current standard? Matthew, could you make some quick points on that?
Then I will probably go to Claire Mack, because I mentioned onshore wind.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
They are about the same thing.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is the level of detail in the strategic spatial energy plan appropriate? The national planning framework is still waiting for the energy strategy and we have council development plans. I have sensed a concern within the industry about planning to the nth degree and going down the route that Wales went down some years ago with technical advice note 8 designing exactly where wind farms should be. Is there an appropriate level of strategic guidance in the spatial energy plan and does it give the industry comfort and confidence? Also, does it give communities an element of knowledge about where energy development is likely to be and the extent of it, without saying, “It’s going to be this wind farm and it’s going to be over there”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Gemma, do you want to add anything on the back of that?