The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2921 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
My final question is about the process of diversification and whether you have comments on that, following on from our discussion about environmental improvements.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
I will come back on that briefly. Mr Doris is right to highlight that there are elements of the statutory instrument that enable alignment with the EU. However, there are other aspects, particularly when it comes to the phasing out of certain POPs within the regulations, where there is active divergence. I do not think that Mr Doris is right to say that this is a temporary measure and that the UK’s—and Scotland’s—approach will eventually align with that of the EU. Yes, it is about adopting regulation of the chemicals that are highlighted under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, and there will be continuing alignment on that matter, but on the pace of change in ruling out and removing these toxic chemicals from our waste streams and our environment, there is now active divergence. That is why I oppose this SI; it is not to do with the other elements that Mr Doris mentioned, which are welcome.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Part 4 of new schedule 5 to the 1991 act lists the improvements that facilitate sustainable and regenerative agriculture. Is the inclusion of that list helpful? Are things missing from it? There was a comment about soil carbon, which of course will be hugely important, but perhaps raises a question about landlord and tenant. Who has access to that resource? Who stewards it? Christopher, do you want to come in?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
I understand. Thank you.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Good morning.
Stephen, you said that Audit Scotland is very much a people-based organisation, which has come through in many of the discussions that we have had in the commission. However, I remain concerned about your level of staff turnover. You wrote to us in December to say that working towards a 2 per cent vacancy factor, which is reflected in the budget, would be pretty challenging, but was nonetheless deliverable. However, we are now looking at a 9 per cent vacancy factor and there is reliance on temporary staff. What issues are affecting that figure? Are you confident that achieving a 2 per cent vacancy factor can remain as an assumption for your future budgets?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Thank you for that. It paints a slightly bigger picture, so it is useful to know. It would be good to get more of that information.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Thanks.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Thank you, Alan. That is useful.
In April this year, you wrote to us about repurposing £287,000 to appoint five additional members of staff at auditor or auditor officer grade to increase your staffing levels in the short term. Can you give us an update on progress in recruiting those staff, given that, as you have said, there are various recruitment challenges, depending on which grade and specialism you are recruiting for?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
On the back of that question, I want to drill down into an aspect that staff have reflected on, which is the availability of training to enable them to deliver high-quality audit work.
It is clear that you offer your in-house teams more training days than private firms do. However, when you ask your own staff whether their training level is adequate to deliver such quality, significant numbers of them still feel that it is not. I want to understand what lies behind that. Is it because you have a lot of new staff coming in who feel that they have particularly high training needs? Does it relate to the points that we discussed earlier, about the need for peer-to-peer support?
It is a little concerning, so I would like to understand how you are addressing your staff’s perception that, even though their training provision is good, as regards the high number of days that are available, it does not seem to give significant numbers of them the confidence that they need to deliver the highest quality of audit work.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
That partially explains things, but I still do not fully understand the differences with the firms. Do staff in the firms not come up against those issues?