The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3659 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Sarah, I will come back to you briefly. Is anything else missing from the bill? A few anomalies have arisen as a result of the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Act 2024 and they are not covered by the bill that is before us. Are there any loose ends that the bill should cover and which it could include as we move forward?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will pose my question only to Sarah, then.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will bring you in, Rob, on where you see the boundary. We could talk about local place plans and the urban environment, but then all the land management decisions are up in the straths and in the hills and really have little to do with the community. In taking evidence, we have spoken to communities around Aberfeldy, for example—Forestry and Land Scotland is doing a consultation in the surrounding area. There is genuine community interest there in, say, forest crofts, as well as in people taking smaller lots, which might well fit with wider management objectives for forestry in the area. Where do you see local place plans fitting into that?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions the culture secretary has had with ministerial colleagues regarding the potential impact on the provision of library services in Mid Scotland and Fife of the proposed local government settlement for 2025-26. (S6O-04256)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
I welcome the real-terms increase in council funding that is coming through the budget. I hope that that will give the flexibility that Perth and Kinross Council needs to take the closures off the table when it meets next Wednesday. However, it is clear that some councils are continually making the case for rural library closures on the basis that the statutory provision can be met from mobile libraries. Does the cabinet secretary agree that that view fundamentally misunderstands the importance of rural libraries as free and accessible cultural and community spaces? Does he agree that it is time to look again at what should constitute a statutory library service, in particular in the rural context?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Leaving aside your comment about the cost of engagement and following the logic of your argument, would that save you money? Instead of having perhaps a speculative housing development on an area of green belt, you would have been able to say, “The community does or does not want this. Therefore, we have done all the consultation. We can go straight into consulting on a land management plan that is driven largely by the local place plan and what the community wants.” I take the point that you did a process that took £70,000 for a couple of days—that is eye-watering—but are you saying that the local place plan sets the agenda and you feed off that and that is a bit simpler?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks. Dennis Overton, you want to come in. Could you also cover the specific Land Commission proposals?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Why, do you think, has the Government gone down this particular route? I think that the original consultation suggested a public interest test on the buyer rather than the transfer test on the seller. I am curious. Do you or any of the other witnesses have views about why the Government has gone down this route, and why it rejected the original proposal?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to drill down a bit into the Land Commission’s proposals for land management plans. It has come up with two specific recommendations. One is that there should be a duty on the landowner to demonstrate how community engagement has effectively informed the land management plan. The other proposal is to ensure there is a duty to refer to local place plans in the land management plans.
I want to get your quick reflections on both or either of those proposals. Are they useful? Would they, from your perspective, enhance the process of LMP development? I can see that Megan MacInnes has a hand up.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks for those comments. I am looking for others to come in. Andrew Howard, you mentioned previous developments and I am aware that there was quite a lot of controversy around your proposed development in the wood of Doune. You alluded to that earlier. It would be useful to hear your thoughts, particularly on local place plans and how your thinking has perhaps evolved from that episode.