The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3379 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I apologise to the chamber for needing to leave before the end of this session of question time.
To ask the Scottish Government what progress has been made to update national guidance for local authorities on their responsibilities to uphold public access rights. (S6O-05293)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
It is clear that the updated guidance is long overdue. It was first drafted in 2003, and it is clear that some councils are failing to adequately enforce access rights in and around communities. One of those communities, which the cabinet secretary will know, is Burntisland. I know that she has recently met the Burntisland Harbour Access Trust and has indicated her intention to meet Forth Ports and Fife Council, to hold them to account over the long-standing issue of community access. What progress has been made under her leadership towards a resolution for that issue?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I recognise that a large number of people responded to the Scottish Government’s consultation. However, to be honest, I am more concerned about the 1,978 people who were seriously injured on our roads last year and the 146 people who lost their lives. The Government raised expectations that it would deliver a measure—dropping the speed limit to 50mph—that would have saved lives. What will the cabinet secretary now say to people in Blair Drummond, Dunkeld and the many other rural communities that have campaigned for commonsense safer speed limits around their communities? What will the Government do to pick up the delivery of safer speed limits and save lives?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
The future of Grangemouth has always been linked to Mossmorran, and for decades they have shared a common workforce. A few weeks ago, the Deputy First Minister came to the chamber and talked about expanding the Grangemouth investment task force to include Mossmorran as a potential location for projects. Can the cabinet secretary give members an update on that?
In addition, given that it seems that a number of projects have now been selected, is it too late—I hope not—to incorporate Mossmorran into the thinking around the work of that task force and could consideration be given to successful projects that can include both sites?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to briefly go back to the 5 per cent vacancy target. Does that in effect reinforce a culture of change in the organisation? Does the fact that staff might be looking at posts that are not being filled prompt conversations around their own workloads and efficiencies? How does that play out in relation to the overall culture of the organisation and the other projects that you are working on around audit modernisation? It feels as if a lot of change is happening.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you for that. I want to move on to talk about the changes that have taken place, particularly the four whole-time equivalent posts that have been removed from the staffing baseline. I want to better understand how that is being absorbed across the organisation.
My understanding is that those posts relate to professional trainees. Will you say a bit more about that? Moreover, given the pressures on the organisation and on your objectives—for example, you have talked about getting back on track to reach target levels—how does the decision to remove those posts link to that?
10:30Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
The message that I am getting is that that broad pipeline of apprenticeships and graduate and professional trainee posts is consistent, with some variation from year to year as a result of changes within the organisation, promotions and everything else.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Could that be unsettling? If colleagues see that a post is not being filled, does that not automatically create a pressure?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you very much.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay.