The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3259 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I am very keen on radical reform in that area. We will not go into that specific reform, but I have a couple of final questions, one for Professor Bell and Richard Robinson and the other for Professor Heald.
My first question is for Professor Heald. This is not specifically about reform but it follows up what you said. In your answers and responses today, you have been really good at putting a lot of what is in your document on to the record. I appreciate that. We have not really talked an awful lot today about the issue of improving public services. Your submission says:
“I have long been worried by the squeezing out of public services expenditure ... by expenditure which is volatile and not amenable to precise forward planning.”
You have talked about some of that already. You say:
“In England, such expenditure is
annually managed expenditure
(with the Treasury funding overspends due to higher claims on pre-set eligibility criteria), whereas in Scotland such expenditure is effectively”
departmental expenditure limit
“(with the Scottish Government having to finance excess expenditure out of the combination of the Barnett formula-determined Block Grant and Scottish tax revenues). This constitutes a serious risk to public services expenditure.”
How do we mitigate such volatility in our current situation?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Professor Bell, on the issue of public service reform, the Royal Society has noted
“that there has been more growth in public sector pay at the lower end of the workplace scale than there has been at the top.”
We know that, on average, the average public sector employee in Scotland earns £2,400 a year gross a year, and £1,500 net, more than those south of the border. You have said:
“The public sector pay policy should align with the market value of the skills needed to deliver transformational change.”
Do you think that the Scottish Government was wrong to emphasise pay rises for lower-paid workers? The alternative is to increase the size of an envelope that is already under strain from higher pay settlements.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Because of the numbers.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
We continue our evidence taking on “Managing Scotland’s Public Finances: A Strategic Approach”. I welcome our second panel: Vikki Manson, deputy head of policy at the Federation of Small Businesses Scotland; David Lonsdale, director of the Scottish Retail Consortium; and David Lott, deputy director for funding, reform and accountability at Universities Scotland.
I intend to allow up to 90 minutes for this session. If our witnesses would like to be brought into the discussion at any point, they should indicate that to the clerk and I will then call them. We have already seen your written submissions, so we will move straight to questions. The first question is a bit of a strange one. I thought that the answer to it might be just a wee bit different from the answers to the questions that we have been asking so far. It is one for you, Ms Manson. You said that
“there have been consultations published proposing changes on a number of different areas”,
and you raised concerns about the level of consultation that has been embarked upon. Will you comment on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Are you looking for a 3 per cent increase or three percentage points of increase?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
The former or the latter?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Is that all? That is not incredibly ambitious.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
What does 3 per cent represent in cash terms, and what private sector investment would that bring in over, say, five years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I wonder how difficult it is going to be to find a joiner, a plumber or an electrician in Australia in 2050 if they move to 80 per cent of the workforce going into tertiary education.
I call John Mason, to be followed by Michelle Thomson.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Vikki, you have said:
“To enable the economy to grow, it is critical that support is given to the small businesses who make up almost all enterprises”.
You have mentioned
“the reintroduction of targeted reliefs for the retail, hospitality, and leisure sector.”
We know that £685 million is going into rates relief across the board this year but, given that the Scottish Government is under severe pressure with its budget, which is more or less fixed—unless we put taxes up, which no one seems keen on at this point, apart from John Mason—and given what we heard from David Lott, who said that £10 million or £15 million of additional funding for research could perhaps bring in eight times that amount in economic activity, should scarce money not go to that sector to create greater innovation, productivity and output, rather than to small businesses, for example, if there is additional money available? That is the kind of question that the Government is wrestling with, so what would you say in response to that?