The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3226 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I turn to Allan Faulds.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Alison?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I think that you would have an uphill struggle convincing the voters of that. I have to be honest.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I think that the Scottish Government is optimistic that that might change after the budget on 30 October. However, as has been pointed out, we already have a five-year 20 per cent reduction in capital, so there will inevitably be reductions here, there and probably just about everywhere.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you.
David, I note that, on public service reform, you have said:
“there is a widespread lack of resource, capacity and ultimately, delivery.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I note that you got that comment about higher fees in. I call Lewis Ryder-Jones, to be followed by Jamie Halcro Johnston.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
It is also about looking at yourself. When I was in Glasgow City Council, it passed a motion that any organisation that had contracts with a local authority would need at least 3 per cent of its workforce to have disabilities. That does not seem very ambitious now, but I found out that, in the council itself, less than 1 per cent of the employees had disabilities. Sometimes, people are looking outwards and not at their own organisations.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
With long-term planning, you are talking about 10, 20 or 30 years, but there are different Governments and stuff like that, with different policy priorities. How practical is it to think that a Government would stick to priorities that someone else decided on umpteen years ago?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I noticed that, throughout your submission, you say things such as that Scotland’s income tax system needs to
“raise more money ... than the rest of the UK”
and that we need to enable
“significantly more public spending on people, public services and green infrastructure”
to improve the
“adequacy of social security entitlements”.
However, you have been coy about how much additional resources should be raised to do those things. Is it an extra £10 million, an extra £100 million or an extra £1 billion?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Max French, you are not particularly impressed with how the framework national outcomes are being implemented. When I was reading your submission, I sat with my yellow marker thinking, “Oh, that’s a really good point”, and I annotated loads of your points.
For example, you say:
“Scotland has lacked a credible—or even discernible—implementation strategy for the NPF since its founding in 2007.”
You said that the NPF is “internationally recognised”, but that
“even when organisations want to adopt and implement the NPF, they lack the tools, guidance and know-how to implement them operationally.”
You are of the view that the NPF is a good idea and that people outwith Scotland have recognised that, but that the framework is not having much impact on the ground. Obviously, I have your submission here, but I am keen for you to talk about that particular issue.