The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3226 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Or if Taylor Swift decided to come back to Scotland.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Ross Greer has a brief supplementary.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Uncommitted reserves make up only about a tenth of the actual reserves. However, uncommitted reserves are equivalent to 3.4 per cent of local government spend, which is still more than twice what the Scottish Government’s available reserve is.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
In the case of the Scottish Government, we are talking about only a couple of days’ worth of running costs.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Do other witnesses have anything to say about that? Adam Boey, in your submission you say that
“A framework should have structure”
and that
“there is no framework—the circular presentation of national outcomes only suggests that all outcomes are equally important, and that some arbitrary performance measures are being associated to them.”
11:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Let us look at the changes that have been proposed. Adam, you said in your submission that you disagree with care being added as a new outcome, because it is
“already covered in ‘Health’ where social care is specifically mentioned—the articulation of the health outcome is better, in terms of a specific impact or result we want to achieve.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
You disagree, Sarah. You said:
“We welcome that this new outcome reflects the need to prioritise social care in Scotland”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Growth and distribution are not necessarily the same thing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Allan Faulds, how do you think that the NPF should drive spending decisions?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Jamie Robertson, another issue that comes out quite forcefully in the submission is flexibility. For example, on page 19, there is a really interesting graph after paragraph 78 that shows that, since 2010-11, there has actually been a significant increase in education spend—21.2 per cent in real terms—while adult social care spending has gone up by 29.4 per cent, and spending on looked-after children by 17.5 per cent. However, that has been matched by huge reductions in other areas—35 per cent in street cleaning, 27 per cent in tourism, 20 per cent in culture and leisure and 26.6 per cent in planning. There are a couple of other figures in there, too.
The submission also says that
“Scotland has a significantly lower pupil/teacher ratio than the rest of UK”,
with 13.2 children per teacher
“compared to 18 in England ... but does not have better educational outcomes.”
I think that I know what you are going to say in answer to this question, but just for the record, how important is it for local authorities to have the flexibility to decide for themselves how many teachers they employ, for example, and whether money should be able to be deployed elsewhere, if required?