The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3226 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
On the issue of outturn data for income tax, which is mentioned in your report, if there was an improvement in the data, would you like the timescale to be somewhat truncated, or is that unlikely due to the way in which the system is set up?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
You are wasted in this job: you should be in diplomacy. Somehow, I had the feeling that you would talk about the timing of the forecasts. Anyway, it was worth a try, wasn’t it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
You have said that the probability of the target for the updated fiscal mandate being met is 54 per cent, which is a bit worrying, is it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
So, there is 0.3 per cent wriggle room. You say on page 158:
“The net impact of the policies announced at this Budget is to reduce real business investment in the near term by 1.8 per cent, or a cumulative £25 billion by the forecast horizon.”
You go on to say:
“If the tax-to-GDP ratio were to remain at its 2024-25 level, tax revenues would be £62.2 billion lower in 2029-30”
than you currently predict.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
On page 83, you say:
“In the downside scenario, public and private capital are substitutes so every additional £1 of public investment reduces business investment by £0.50.”
You go on to say that
“the increase in public investment leaves GDP only 0.6 per cent higher in 50 years”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for your evidence today. It is very much appreciated. Before we wind up, are there any further points that the OBR would like to make to the committee?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
It is greatly appreciated that you have come here in person. It makes a big difference to our scrutiny. Thank you very much.
That finishes the public part of our meeting. I will call a five-minute break to enable our witnesses, broadcasting staff and official report staff to leave.
11:16 Meeting continued in private until 12:14.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
You have said that a quarter of a million employers gain from the budget, 940,000 employers lose out and 820,000 employers see no change.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
In table 2.1 on page 19, you say that from 2019 up to 2028, GDP is expected to rise by a cumulative 4.3 per cent, which puts the 4 per cent impact of Brexit into some context. Just over 4 per cent in nine years is kind of pitiful, really. The UK economy appears to be somewhat atherosclerotic, because in table A.1 on page 168, you say that the
“World GDP at purchasing power parity”
is expected to grow between 3.1 per cent and 3.3 per cent from 2023 onwards, which is more than six times that of the UK. What is your perspective on that, and how can we break that cycle of stagnation?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Kenneth Gibson
In your “Economic and fiscal outlook” report, you say:
“The outlook for productivity growth remains our most important and uncertain forecast judgement.”
You go on to say:
“The effects of subdued investment, the energy price shock, and Brexit compound the ongoing weakness seen since the financial crisis.”
Productivity growth is of great concern to the committee; we have raised it on numerous occasions in numerous fora with different people. How can we break the productivity bottleneck? You have also raised concerns about the number of people who are economically inactive. As a percentage of the population, there are now more people who are economically inactive in Scotland than there are in the UK.
Do you see the way to break the productivity problem being through technology and migration? What impact is demography—the ageing of the indigenous population, if you want to put it that way, or the people who live here already—having on productivity? One would think that migration and technological advances would improve productivity, but an ageing population is creating a drag on it.