The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4779 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
That is what we are trying to grasp, which is why we are relying on the evidence of our witnesses.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
If you cannot put a figure on it in pounds, shillings and pence or anything of that nature, then over which other areas should transport be prioritised? Perhaps the best that we can envisage would be a static budget—it would probably represent a decline in real terms but be static or slightly higher in cash terms—so we will have to prioritise. If you are saying that we should spend more on public transport, for example—I ask about that because you specifically mentioned it in your submission—what should it be prioritised over?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for answering my opening questions. I will now allow colleagues in.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I should point out that the Scottish Government’s capital allocation was cut by 9.8 per cent in the current financial year. I understand the position that councils are in; the whole budget is in that position.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much. I take it that that last point is about avoiding what we might call waste tourism. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. Thank you very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
That has exhausted our questions.
Item 2 is formal consideration of the motion on the instrument.
Motion moved,
That the Finance and Public Administration Committee recommends that the Scottish Landfill Tax (Prescribed Landfill Site Activities) Amendment Order 2022 (SSI 2022/233) be approved.—[Tom Arthur]
Motion agreed to.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for your time today, minister.
I suspend the meeting to allow for a brief changeover of witnesses.
14:22 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Obviously, you are aware of the evidence that we took from organisations such as the Scottish Childminding Association. Over the past few years, since the policy started to come in, childminding has reduced significantly and there are now 26 per cent fewer childminders in Scotland. Some have obviously decided that they want to work in nurseries, but others have left for other reasons. Last week, the committee was advised that
“the main reason why childminders had been leaving or were planning to leave the workforce in the next five years was the significant increase in bureaucracy and paperwork and the duplicative quality assurance at national and local levels, which has quite simply become unsustainable.”
Graeme McAlister, who gave that evidence, went on to say:
“In my submission, I itemise 10 or 12 different frameworks and standards, each of which comes with different outcomes reporting”
and that, although quality assurance is obviously important,
“it has to be proportionate, joined up and light touch”.
To many people, including me, that duplication seems to be a bit like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
Mr McAlister went on to talk about local authorities planning
“twice-yearly inspections and twice-yearly self-evaluations.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 21 June 2022; c 28, 30.]
That is obviously putting off a lot of childminders; it also has policy implications. In addition, from a financial perspective, all that bureaucracy being imposed on childminders must cost a huge amount of resource. Are there any plans to have a one-stop shop, so that there is not that overlap and duplication of effort?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2022
Kenneth Gibson
The figures show that there has been considerable overfunding, but COSLA has pointed out that, if 98 per cent of the anticipated number of children in an area take up the offer, you cannot, for obvious reasons, reduce staffing. You still need the same staff ratios and so on.
In any case, it looks like there has been, right from the start, an overestimation of the number of children requiring 1,140 hours of ELC. I understand that only 85 per cent of the 98 per cent who have taken up the offer of 1,140 hours have done so exclusively; that might be part of the reason, but surely, with nursery provision, you can look a couple of years ahead and see which children will require it, because they will be turning three. There is the exception of the vulnerable two-year-olds, but you will still have two or three years to plan ahead. However, there still seems to have been a significant overestimation of the number of children requiring the provision. Why is that the case?