The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3407 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
There will always be an impact on services, given the time involved and so on. Is there an argument for having a separate fund for public inquiries so that, when the Government announces a public inquiry, organisations can dip into a specific fund to try to mitigate some of the impacts on the NHS, justice services or whatever?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Mary, do you have any examples of anything like that? Do you feel that inquiries should stick to the terms of reference that have been set? I understand that, on occasion, the terms of reference can change during an inquiry and can be widened or deepened.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
There have certainly been calls for that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Rebecca McKee, the number of inquiry recommendations has ranged from one to up to 290. Between 1990 and 2024, 54 inquiries made 3,175 recommendations. Mary Morgan made an interesting point about interim recommendations. What are your thoughts on that?
The Thirlwall inquiry, which is investigating the circumstances surrounding the actions of former nurse Lucy Letby, conducted a review of past inquiry recommendations on healthcare issues and found that many had not been acted on. Recommendations are made, the Government accepts them and then nothing seems to happen.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Mary Morgan, you have said that increased consistency in how inquiries are conducted would likely lead to better cost-effectiveness. If inquiries are judge led, they might be consistent but there will not be a positive impact on costs, because one of the concerns with judge-led inquiries is that they seem to take much longer in undertaking the evidential aspect of the inquiry and publishing their report. Do you share that concern, given the implications for the health service?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
When we put that question to the Faculty of Advocates, it said that, even though the same documents feature many times, some folk have annotated them, so people still have to look at them.
I thank both witnesses for their evidence, which is really appreciated. If there is anything that we have omitted or not touched on or something that you are desperate to say, now is your opportunity to put it on the record.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good point.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You touched on whether an inquiry is statutory or non-statutory and whether it is judge led. UK-wide figures over the past 30 years show that, in the past decade, 23 out of 24 public inquiries have been judge led, with the figure being 18 out of 23 in the previous decade and 20 out of 33 in the decade before that. Do you think that, unless a public inquiry is now judge led, it is not considered to be the gold standard that those who clamour for such inquiries demand?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That is helpful. I am just exploring different ways of carrying out inquiries timeously and, frankly, less expensively.
Your written submission states:
“NSS suggests that current processes for monitoring public inquiry costs are inadequate ... Costs are not reimbursed or reported consistently. There is no oversight of costs incurred.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Amen.