The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4037 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
But in relation to pensions, you must know a wee bit in advance that folk are going to retire, surely? If it was a few million pounds here or there, I could understand—some people retire early because of ill health, for example. However, £217.7 million is quite a significant sum of money and one would have thought that a sum of that amount would have been anticipated well in advance.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Moving on, I note the reference in paragraph 17 to
“£40 million released from the Affordable Housing Supply Programme due to ongoing supply issues and the effect this has on the pace of delivery.”
Is that because the pandemic has led to construction difficulties? Is it your hope that that money will subsequently be put back into affordable housing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I found paragraph 30 of section C.1 of the supporting document quite interesting. You say:
“The minor differences between the Scottish Government underspend as reported in the Accounts (and discussed in detail by Audit Scotland) and underspend against HM Treasury budget aggregates arise through a number of reasons; differing accounting and budgeting treatment of capital expenditure, differences in the scoring of working capital for nondepartmental public bodies and different treatment of expected credit losses.”
Having what are, in effect, two different systems obviously makes transparency difficult. Have there been discussions about, or is any work on-going, to try to smooth over some of those differences to ensure that we have a uniform method of accounting?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I would be happy for you to write to Liz Smith on that, minister.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Minister, under section C, “Scotland Reserve and Funding Position Details”, you say:
“Despite this continually evolving, volatile position, reserve limits remain fixed. Those limits being a cap of £700 million with annual drawdowns normally restricted to £250 million for Resource and £100 million for Capital and Financial Transactions combined. As we are currently within a defined period of “Scotland Specific Economic Shock” (as set out in the Fiscal Framework) the annual drawdown limits are waived but the cap of £700 million remains.”
As I mentioned in the previous session, John Mason said only last week that the University of Glasgow has greater reserves than the Scottish Government is allowed to have. That gives some perspective. Can you tell us, because the previous witnesses were unsure when asked directly, when that three-year period of Scotland-specific economic shock will end?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
What difficulties are the reserve limits creating for the Scottish Government in delivering on its budget?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Yes, I would certainly be happy with that, but I am not the one who is asking questions on this area—if Douglas Lumsden, Michelle Thomson and Liz Smith are happy, we can take that approach.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thanks for that, Daniel.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I welcome to the meeting our second panel of witnesses: Paul Bradley, policy and public affairs manager at the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations; David Melhuish, director, Scottish Property Federation; and Alastair Sim, director at Universities Scotland.
Thank you all for your written submissions to the inquiry. There are no opening statements so we will move straight to questions.
I will begin with Universities Scotland. I found all the submissions to be really interesting and there is a great contrast between them, so the committee will probably ask you all a similar number of questions.
Mr Sim, your opener is quite direct. The last paragraph on the first page says:
“Put bluntly, other areas of Scottish public life that should be prioritised for investment, including higher education, look as if they will have to fight for the leftovers from the highest priority commitments.”
That is on the back of your saying that the Scottish Government’s priorities should include universities and higher education. The issue with that is that every single organisation—and I mean every single organisation—that comes to the committee says the same thing: we need more resources for our sector. You just have to fill in the name of the sector.
You have made arguments for why you think it should be the universities sector, but where should the resources come from, and how much additional resource should the Scottish Government be putting into the sector?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I appreciate that, and you have made a strong argument, but the two questions that I asked initially have still not been answered. How much additional resources are needed and from where should they come? In the earlier part of the meeting, we discussed preventative spend. A lot of the growth that you are talking about will not come this year or next, but the money will have to come out of the budget this year and next. Where should the resources come from? Local government has made a passionate plea and the SCVO is also keen to have additional resources.