The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3846 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Craig Hoy has a brief question.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for that.
We will have a five-minute break before we move into private session, to allow our witnesses and broadcasting and official report staff to leave.
11:27 Meeting continued in private until 11:51.Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You will be aware that this committee has been carrying out an investigation into the cost-effectiveness of public inquiries, given their monumental costs and the many years that they seem to take. In the past week, we have seen demands for public inquiries into grooming and ferries from some Opposition politicians. No doubt, there will be plenty of others as we progress.
We will produce a report in the autumn, and there is an area that I want to ask you about. We have had compelling evidence that the current situation, whereby a specific budget can be severely impacted, is proving detrimental to services. The opportunity cost to the police or national health service of having a big chunk of its budget dedicated to an inquiry over a number of years means, quite frankly, that the people who would expect to benefit from those services are impacted, as the NHS and the police have made quite clear. Would you be sympathetic to the creation of a budget for public inquiries—regardless of what the inquiry is, how long it takes or what it costs—that is separate from the budgets of the organisations that are involved in the inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You were strategy and external affairs director prior to taking up your current post, and you will know a lot of your colleagues and the Government well, which is obviously why you are now in the post. Are you able to determine which departments are doing best, which—if any—are performing sub-optimally and, if so, how those will be improved?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You can call them directorates if you want.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am sorry to interrupt, but you have got to look at what you want to achieve first, and surely you then have to say the optimal number of people who would be needed to achieve that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning, and welcome to the 21st meeting in 2025 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee. The first item on our agenda is an evidence-taking session on the cost-effectiveness of Scottish public inquiries.
I welcome to the meeting John Sturrock KC and John Campbell KC. We have received apologies from Craig Hoy, who will be a few minutes late because of traffic.
I thank both witnesses for their short, sharp and helpful submissions to the committee’s call for views, and I will move straight to questions, kicking off with Mr Sturrock, methinks. In answer to the second question on the transparency of public inquiries in our call for views, you said that there is
“insufficient transparency and scrutiny in particular around control over timescales and costs.”
How can that be improved?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Oh—yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am absolutely sure that they would, but, as has been mentioned, an inquiry might be used in some circumstances to get a minister out of a tight spot politically, rather than necessarily being in the long-term public good. It would be helpful if ministers could say, in a diplomatic way, that they want to consider something but that the criteria for having a public inquiry have not been met, because otherwise we could have inquiries into myriad different things, and where would we be then? We want to reach a sensible and optimal position that also defends the value of public inquiries as more than something that is just grasped at when people are concerned that the services that they thought would deliver for them have not done so.
Would either of you like to make any further points before I wind up this session?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You do not get many public inquiry reports that are as short as that.