The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3846 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I want to let my colleagues in so I do not want to go on for too much longer. I am thinking about major investigative inquiries, such as the inquiry into the MS Estonia maritime disaster, which lasted 24.9 months. Some 852 people died in that disaster, which I remember very vividly. I looked at the memorial in Tallin when the committee was in Estonia last year. For events that are as emotive as that, if you cannot compel witnesses, how difficult is it to get the kind of outcome that would be desired by the families of the victims and so on? The report talks about how the system has a very high level of public acceptance in Sweden. In cases like the Estonia disaster, how would the legal profession be involved and what would the impact of that be on the delivery of that inquiry?
09:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much. Before we wind up, I have one final question for Professor Dahlström. The research says:
“The government is under no formal obligation to implement the inquiry’s recommendations. In practice, since policy advisory inquiries are an integrated part of the overall policy process, many inquiries have led to institutional or legislative change.”
What about investigative inquiries? In response to the adoption commission, the Swedish Government said:
“The government takes the commission’s presentation very seriously, and we will now carefully analyze their conclusions and proposals to make well-considered decisions moving forward.”
Is there a difference between policy and investigative inquiries in terms of how recommendations are implemented? It seems that policy proposals are much more likely to be implemented. Is that just my reading of it, or are the recommendations of both inquiry types being implemented effectively?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for that. I ask our guests whether, in winding up, they want to make any final points or emphasise any issue or area that they feel that we have not covered yet. Dr Prasser would you like to go first?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Professor Dahlström, the last word is yours.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I get the impression that you are not necessarily a big fan of royal commissions, that you feel that there is a preponderance of them, and that the knee-jerk reaction to almost any kind of event there is to call for one to be established. We have similar concerns here, in that everyone seems to think that a public inquiry is the answer. As you have pointed out, though, even if an inquiry is held sometimes people do not get from it the answers that they think they will.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
One of the things that the committee is looking at is how we can provide a level of justice or restitution for victims in a way that is more timeous and fair to the taxpayer and wider society. As I understand it, New Zealand is trying to ensure a two-year timeframe for royal commissions. Is that realistic and deliverable? Is it likely to be breached in many cases or does it provide a discipline that enables much more efficient and effective working?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You were saying earlier that it has to be completed in two years and that is best practice. You aim for two years but, if it goes beyond that, that is the situation, although they must give good reasons for doing so.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What is the public perception of royal commissions in Australia? Do people have a lot of confidence in them? We understand that the public in Sweden have confidence in the equivalent processes there, which seem to be relatively short, sharp and inexpensive compared with the ones that we have just discussed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
No. [Laughter.]
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Welcome to the 28th meeting in 2025 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee. Ross Greer sends his apologies and will join us when he can.
The first item on our agenda is to take evidence from two panels of witnesses on the cost effectiveness of Scottish public inquiries, looking specifically at international examples and comparisons. I am delighted to say that, for our first panel, we are joined remotely by Professor Carl Dahlström, professor of political science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Dr Scott Prasser, a public policy consultant and commentator from Australia. I welcome you both to the meeting and thank you for taking the time to speak to the committee about your experience and knowledge of public inquiries in your jurisdictions. We will move straight to questions.
Good morning to you, Professor Dahlström. I note that, in your report “Public inquiries in Sweden and Norway”, you say that public inquiries are initiated by the Swedish Cabinet by issuing a commission directive. You say:
“This outlines the inquiry’s terms of reference, specifies the type of inquiry to be held, identifies the issue to be investigated, and sets a closing date.”
Are those terms generally stuck to?
