The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3846 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
In relation to multiyear funding, for years, the Scottish Government has said that it does not receive multiyear funding from the UK Government. Do you think that the spending review will be an opportunity to bring in multiyear funding for the third sector? In your submission, you mentioned the increased employer national insurance contribution costs. The Scottish Government received £339 million to deal with that, but the cost of the impact on the public sector is about £700 million-odd. Given that the Scottish Government has not received sufficient additional funding to compensate for that, how can it pass that on without having to take money from its own projects and programmes?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I will bring in Mike Brown and then Michael Kellet; there are too many Michaels and Mikes here.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I will bring in Craig Hoy and Mike Brown in a minute or two. First, I have a question for Michael Kellett, which goes back to the subject of preventative spend.
In the first three years of the 2011-16 parliamentary session, John Swinney had £500 million available to embed the preventative spend approach. At that time there was resistance, particularly from the NHS, about disinvesting in some projects or areas that were not as effective as others in order to then invest in preventative spend. Some momentum was lost subsequent to that period.
Is it Public Health Scotland’s view that investing in prevention now will reduce demand later, and so disinvestment might not be as necessary as one might think? Craig Hoy gave the example of Mounjaro to illustrate that investing successfully might reduce the number of people who will need operations five years from now, or reduce the incidence of heart attacks and strokes. That would inevitably bring savings, so disinvestment is perhaps not as essential as we thought previously. What is your view on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I know—you are just a youngster.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I think that we would all accept that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You make a point, because one of the issues about income tax is behavioural change. The Scottish Fiscal Commission will say that, because of behavioural change, the Scottish Government will not raise 80 to 90 per cent of the amount that it hopes to raise with the top level of tax. That is not necessarily people moving elsewhere; they can just decide to work fewer hours. However, a property tax is on something that is there—it cannot be avoided.
How could that be delivered without cross-party agreement? That is the issue. There is no consensus about how that could effectively be delivered. One of the reasons for that is that people are concerned, particularly six months before an election, about the response of voters. Professor David Bell said last week that if you give people an extra £500 they just shrug their shoulders, but if you take £500 away from them they are ready to lynch you. People who gain are not particularly impressed, but the people who lose out are extremely upset.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for that. I want to thank all of our guests this afternoon. It has been an interesting and very helpful session for the committee.
I will now just call a break until 10 past 12 to allow our witnesses to change and to give members a break.
12:05 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I will move to the main point that I want to ask about. What direction do you think that you can take the Scottish Fiscal Commission in? There is quite a difference between you and, indeed, Ms Riccomini, and the two outgoing professors, who are very much from an academic background. Your background is considerably different. Your CV is, of course, excellent; you were very much involved in the establishment of Revenue Scotland, which is, I would think, a really significant thing on anyone’s career path, and you also have lots of experience in the Scottish Government, where you were a director. What do you think that your imprint will be on the Scottish Fiscal Commission?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I have one last question, because I know that colleagues are keen to come in, and it is on the issue of communication, which I have already touched on this morning. The OECD has said that relative to, for example, its Dutch equivalent and one or two others, the Scottish Fiscal Commission, although doing an excellent job at all levels, could do more to broaden its impact on the Scottish media and the wider public. I know that that is pushing a lot uphill, because I am not convinced that the majority of people in Scotland are necessarily interested in the fine points of the commission’s deliberations, but what can you do to enable the Scottish Fiscal Commission to have a bigger impact with stakeholders as well as with the wider public in Scotland?