The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3226 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Sure—thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Sorry—I had David Lonsdale coming in after Daniel Johnson, as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much. Polly, you have the last word.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Do not ask for anything yet—and you are getting one thing, and one thing only.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
That is fair enough—and it was a succinct answer. Does anyone else want to comment on transparency?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
There is an issue with digital exclusion, but we will not go into that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
That concludes our deliberations with our first panel. I thank each of our witnesses for coming along and answering our questions. We will now have a break until 20 past 4, when we will reconvene with our second panel.
16:11 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
We will continue to take pre-budget evidence on Scotland’s public finances in 2023-24. I welcome to the meeting Councillor Katie Hagmann, the resources spokesperson for the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, Kirsty Flanagan, chair of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy local government directors of finance Scotland section, who is attending remotely, and Paul Manning, executive director of finance and corporate resources and depute chief executive, South Lanarkshire Council.
As we did with the previous panel, we will move straight to questions. I will ask the first few questions.
COSLA’s submission is excellent and very detailed. I found the appendices particularly useful. However, the thrust appears to be that additional funding is required for local government, although all the indications are that the settlement that the Scottish Government will receive will be static in cash terms and a decrease in real terms.
In your submission, you highlight an anticipated £743 million reduction in core funding by 2026-27. If that is not to come from local government, where should it come from? Should it come from other areas of the Scottish budget—you touched on health and social care, for example—or do you envisage that additional powers over planning and building control fees and tourist tax, which you suggest could be provided to local government, could fill that gap? It is a nice easy question to start.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
You talk about the critical mass being reduced significantly in some smaller councils. I, for example, am an MSP for North Ayrshire and there are three Ayrshire councils, which were created for political purposes rather than for any other reason. Does that mean that those three councils would be in a better position if they merged into one local authority, because they would not be viable any longer? Would the situation in Forth Valley with Falkirk, Stirling and Clackmannanshire councils be the same? If the situation progresses as you suggest, where would we be in relation to delivering support services?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. Before I let colleagues in, I will ask two more questions. The first is for Kirsty Flanagan. Your joint submission says:
“greater emphasis should be placed on tracking outcomes rather than ... spend.”
Should not both things be done?