The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3226 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. Before we move on to transparency, I will bring in Alison Douglas.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I could not agree more. I have worked in the third sector and the private sector; when I was in the private sector, there was a staff suggestion scheme—and it had almost no impact. It asked things like, “How can the company save money and do things better and better?” I suggested that the company should incentivise people so that they got a share of the savings. The company then introduced a scheme where employees could get up to 10 per cent of what they saved by doing things more efficiently; it was then absolutely inundated by suggestions, because there was a reward for the people making them. Obviously, they were not all implemented, but that incentive stuck with me.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Only two other folk have said that they want to comment on tax—David Lonsdale, again, and Clare Reid—but if anyone else wants to speak about tax, please do.
Incidentally, David, I found it curious that in your submission you said that you want to reduce
“the number of local authorities, rates assessors, quangos, and planning authorities.”
I do not want to go into all of that, but I found it bizarre that you want to reduce the number of rates assessors because there is already a chronic shortage of them. How does not having people to assess properties help?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Your submission says:
“savings might accrue from reducing the number of local authorities, rates assessors, quangos, and planning authorities.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Are you not worried that some local authorities, such as Argyll and Bute, Highland or Edinburgh, would benefit disproportionately from such a tax, as opposed to authorities such as North Lanarkshire or Clackmannanshire?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I was planning a holiday in Coatbridge.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Nobody has indicated that they want to come in, so I turn to Stephen Smellie. In contrast to that, Unison Scotland states in its submission:
“An IPPR Scotland report last year indicated that reducing the threshold for higher income tax to £40k (from the current £43k) would raise £690m.”
In fact, Unison has made a number of suggestions about how tax should be raised. What is your view on how we move forward from the point that we are at following Friday’s statement?