The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3226 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. I am sure that colleagues have a number of other questions that they wish to ask.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Hold on a second—we are not at the time when it was written any more. I am talking about where we are now, which is more important as we move forward.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
To be fair, having read all your written submissions, I think that you have more than misgivings. Correct me if I am wrong, but from what I am reading it is clear that there is strong opposition to the whole philosophy of the bill.
We are looking at the financial aspects of the bill. Sharon Wearing, what alternatives could the Scottish Government deliver if it was not going down this path?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I am looking for a one-word answer to get absolute clarification on that. Should the financial memorandum be revisited?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
It is a one-word answer.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I have just been advised that there are 1,044 care homes in Scotland.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
That is very important.
Paul, in your written submission, you said:
“If a new National Care Service cannot be fully funded, then the Scottish Government should agree to the last recommendation in the Independent Review of Adult Social Care, to consider and consult on options for raising new revenues to increase investment in social care.”
What kind of new revenues and options would we be talking about, potentially?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
In your submission you say:
“the level of uncertainty and remaining unknowns do not allow for any certainty around the reasonableness and accuracy of the costs and savings included.”
You go on to say:
“The use of large ranges in costing do demonstrate the uncertainty within the”
financial memorandum. I put this question to the bill team when you were there: has the financial memorandum met the best estimates criteria?
11:15Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
That might be the case in numerical terms, but people are saying that, for a bill of such magnitude, the consultation period was simply not long enough for them to provide the detailed responses that they would have liked to have given. Why was the length of the consultation constrained in the way that it was? For something so momentous—which includes, for example, the transfer of 75,000 staff—one would have thought that getting it right would be the most important thing and that the consultation could and should have been extended to allow for more detailed deliberations. As I mentioned, it took place over the summer, when there was a lot of disruption—people were still coming out of the pandemic, and they did not have the same ability to communicate with colleagues. Why was more time not given as a result to enable people to tease out a lot of the issues that have been raised?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2022
Kenneth Gibson
In the consultation, you all responded to the question of whether there was adequate time for consultation with a one-word answer, which was “No”. You might have missed some of the previous evidence session today because you were travelling here, but I put that point to the bill team, who obviously tried to defend the length of the consultation period.
How much time do you feel that there could have been for the consultation? How could it have been improved? What further consultation could there be? I will ask all three of you the same questions. What confidence do you have in the level of engagement on co-design, which the bill team mentioned on at least four separate occasions in the previous session? They talked about being proactive and engaging with stakeholders and so on, but that does not appear to be your collective view. Perhaps you can talk us through that. Sarah Watters may want to go first on this occasion.