The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3846 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Yes. Basically, there is a concern that some of the figures that we may be using are considerably out of date. You also talk about how the whole capital spending is forecast to create a gap of about £2.1 billion in capital investment, highlighting the importance of the prioritisation of capital spending towards the Scottish Government’s priorities in the Scottish spending review 2025.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
A lot of little projects might be a good idea then, it seems. Just one last thing from me and it is on transparency. I will stick with you, Mr Sousa. You have said:
“One of our main gripes with these documents is the lack of detail and access provided to external parties such as us to scrutinise the underlying assumptions.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I wondered about that, because I do not think that Wales would be too chuffed about such a move.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I will resist the temptation to add my own tuppenceworth, because five people are waiting to come in, and I am sure that several of them want to speak about preventative spend.
11:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You have done it so many times in the past 15 years.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Do any of our guests want to pick up on that?
11:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Your answers have been very good and also very coherent.
I will go back to an issue that you touched on. In the health service the problem is that demand always exceeds the supply of resources, by which I mean both people and money. There are often arguments about, for example, whether £50,000 should be spent on a cancer-busting drug that might give a patient only a year of life, or three months of good-quality life, or whether that money should be spent on providing 10 operations, doing coronary artery bypass grafts or taking other simple, straightforward measures. How is Public Health Scotland working to address that? Such situations can be very emotional. To someone who has a relative with cancer, a drug that could give them an extra year of life will be all important. However, the NHS has to look at other potential considerations.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
One of the issues with spend to save is that you have to have the money to be able to say, “Let’s take that away from existing services to invest it long term.” There is an issue about the gap that we have, which is £2.1 billion in capital and £2.6 billion in resource as things stand over the next five years.
Dave Moxham, you are suggesting that taxes should be increased and you said in your paper that there should be a tax review. For example, you said:
“Taxing wealth in the short-term via a focus on particular categories of wealth, while exploring options to tax net wealth. Making polluters pay... Scrapping or re-designing tax reliefs.”
You have already mentioned the small-bonus scheme and replacing the council tax. Can you elaborate on that a bit more?
The issue, of course, is that there is resistance at UK level. Jonathan Reynolds, for example, who was business secretary until last week, said that it was just plain “daft”. Eight of the 12 countries that have brought in wealth taxes have since removed them because they do not feel that they bring in the revenue.
There is also an issue about behavioural response. Some sectors such as finance and engineering have said that they cannot attract the people to Scotland that they would like to because we already have higher tax levels. Can you elaborate more about how such taxation would be delivered?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The next item is evidence taking on two nominations for appointment to the Scottish Fiscal Commission. As members will be aware, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government recently wrote to the committee, nominating Dr Eleanor Ryan and Justine Riccomini as SFC commissioners. Members have received copies of the nominees’ CVs and the personal specification for the roles, and we will take evidence first from Dr Ryan and then from Ms Riccomini. We have around 50 minutes for this item.
I welcome Dr Eleanor Ryan to the meeting. First, Dr Ryan, I congratulate you on your appointment, subject to parliamentary approval.
I note that in paragraph 10 of your statement you say that your consultancy business depends heavily on effective communication. Does that extend to having submissions with fonts of sufficient point size that you can read them? One of the concerns that I have about your submission, and that of your fellow applicant, is that the writing is so tiny that, short of a magnifying glass, I would not have been able to read it. I had to get the clerks to increase the point size. It might seem like a minor point, but it is certainly significant.
I bet that you did not think that you would be asked that.