The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3846 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The public do not consider those inquiries to be particularly credible then, do they?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Dr Prasser, who spoke in the previous session, talked about some of the inquiries and royal commissions being a lawyers’ picnic—that it is almost like there is a dripping roast for the legal profession. He talked about folk becoming millionaires for chairing these royal commissions. I am wondering about the role of the legal profession in inquiries in New Zealand.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Do they want to come and work over here?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We have not read your paper yet because it was emailed out only half an hour ago and we have been taking evidence. We have not had a chance to read it.
As well as a recommendation of having two years for inquiries, you talked about them staying within budget. I take it therefore that, when inquiries are set up, a budget is allocated.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The first witness we took evidence from for our work on public inquiries said that his inquiry, which looked into child abuse in Jersey, went back subsequently, a year or two later, to look at the effectiveness of the recommendations being implemented and what had changed. Is there any follow-up on what happens in New Zealand?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for that. I will open up the session to colleagues around the table. The first will be Liz Smith, to be followed by John Mason.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for that. I want to thank you in particular for taking the time and the trouble to come all the way to Edinburgh to give evidence. The committee very much appreciates that. It is always best when people come here in person.
Our final evidence session on this inquiry will take place on 25 November. We will hear from the Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic in person. We will then publish a report setting out recommendations to the Scottish Government before the end of the year.
That concludes the public part of today’s meeting. We will now move into private session to consider two draft reports and a work programme. I will call a five-minute break to enable the official report and broadcasting teams to leave. Thank you very much.
11:38 Meeting continued in private until 12:44.Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It is interesting to look at the contrasts between here and Australia. The issue about inquiries here is that people want justice for a slight—or a perceived slight—or, indeed, want to look at how, say, a disaster that has happened can be avoided. An obvious example here in Scotland is the Piper Alpha disaster, in which 167 people died; that inquiry was actually brought in in 13 months at a fairly modest cost, and yet, as I have said, the costs of subsequent inquiries that we have had have gone up exponentially.
What is the trend in Australia with regard to that cost envelope? What kind of budgets are the Australian royal commissions brought in at? What controls do they have? Moreover, has there been an inflationary impact on budgets, or have they stayed much the same over the years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We have only 36 judges in Scotland. If three or four of them are tied up in inquiries, it is a 10 per cent hit straight away to the court process.
We have no further questions from colleagues around the table so, as you will have heard me do in the previous session, I want to give you an opportunity to make any points or emphasise areas that you think that we have not covered.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Your report also said that
“commissions have no specific power to compel private individuals or entities to provide them information or testimony”.
What are the implications of that? Will you also tell us about the role of the legal profession in inquiries in Sweden?
