The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3407 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Will that, in itself, not be helpful in reducing the timeframe?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
But that is what people who call for the inquiries are often seeking.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Yes, but if a 10,000-page report or whatever is produced at the end, who will read it? Denmark and Sweden produced Covid reports years ago. Ultimately, we can get to the stage at which there are diseconomies of scale. We might end up with something so monumental that no one can grasp it. Are we in danger of doing that with the Covid inquiries and perhaps with the Scottish child abuse inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Given how cumbersome inquiries are in Scotland and in the rest of the UK, relative to other areas, what can we do differently to ensure that the people who clamour for inquiries get the justice that they need and deserve but that that does not take five, 10 or 15 years or have an impact on public services? For example, some NHS services have to be forgone in order to fund aspects of inquiries.
11:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
An inquiry is not done without an impact on other areas, which is an issue. If it is an NHS-based inquiry, the NHS is more or less expected to fund it from resources that would otherwise go into doctors, nurses, medicines and patients.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Can you think of any examples where the terms of reference were spot on and helped delivery of a tight inquiry? In contrast, can you think of inquiries where the terms of reference were woolly, which led to an unsatisfactory approach that ran off in different directions and stuff like that, rather than focusing on what the core purpose of the inquiry was meant to be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Professor Cameron, who gave evidence to the committee two weeks ago, talked about the Jersey child abuse inquiry. He said that they went back two years after the inquiry had concluded to see what recommendations had or had not been implemented. In his experience, that is the only time that that has happened.
You will be pleased to know that this will be my last question before I open up the discussion to colleagues around the table. Do you feel that that should be de rigueur for public inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning, and welcome to the 19th meeting in 2025 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee. We have received apologies from Craig Hoy and Ross Greer.
Under our public agenda item, we will take evidence on the cost-effectiveness of Scottish public inquiries. I welcome Rebecca McKee, a senior researcher from the Institute for Government, and Mary Morgan, the chief executive of NHS National Services Scotland.
We have received a written submission from Mary Morgan, but we have not received one from Rebecca McKee, so will you take a couple of minutes to talk through what the Institute for Government does in relation to public inquiries, Rebecca?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
There is a concern about vested interests and that that situation could continue.
Mary Morgan, do you want to come in?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That is great. Thank you very much for your evidence. We will continue our inquiry, but that concludes our evidence session and, indeed, today’s meeting.
Meeting closed at 11:50.