The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4037 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
In my area, the council is about £6.8 million down, even after the Scottish Government has made those payments, which accounts for about 54 per cent of the increase in council tax this year. What has been the practical impact of that across the board?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Let us move on. Technical adjustments increased the budget by £246.8 million. Will you talk us through what those technical adjustments are and what that really means?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I understand that. Of today’s six witnesses, Hazel Johnson is the only one whose submission has been supportive of the levy. The submissions from the other five witnesses are not supportive. What is your view on who should pay for the work that needs to be done? We have heard it suggested that everyone from architects to manufacturers to companies that were involved in previous construction should pay. I do not know whether the cladding was manufactured in Scotland, China or Germany, so I do not imagine that that would be a big source of potential income.
Who else could the Government raise the levy from? We are talking about spending £200 million a year, but it will cost £3.1 billion to remediate cladding in Scotland. The proposed tax is aimed at only 15 per cent of that. It will go some way towards raising funds, but who else should the required funding be raised from? Others can answer that question as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
But hold on—you are talking about £141.9 million, not about £5 million or £10 million here or there. I have looked at the figures over a number of years, and the volatility only ever seems to go one way. It is never overestimated; it always seems to be underestimated. That is a huge amount of money. Surely, the Government must know roughly how many people are going to retire next year, yet it underestimates pensions by £141.9 million for the NHS and teachers alone.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I thank you all for your invaluable evidence today. It will be a heavy shift for the minister when he gives evidence to us next week, along with Revenue Scotland.
Meeting closed at 12:59.Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
But many developers set up single-purpose vehicles—in other words, subsidiaries of the main company—so that when things go a bit awry with a development, the main company has no liability. I have experienced that situation with a number of developments in my constituency, so there will be a myriad of examples across Scotland and the rest of the UK. How likely is it that we will be able to pursue some of the companies that are responsible on a polluter-pays basis? They could simply rename and restructure the company so that it is not the same company that did the stuff that we are all upset about.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
If the council does not put in place a bond, the developer can just scarper and the council will be left facing those costs. That has happened with at least two developments in my constituency, and I know that it has happened in other places. If everyone behaved according to the rules, things would be fine, but that is the issue that the Government faces, which is why it is proposing an up-front levy.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning and welcome to the 30th meeting in 2025 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee. The first item on our agenda is an evidence session with the Minister for Public Finance on the Budget (Scotland) Act 2025 Amendment Regulations 2025. The minister is joined by Scottish Government officials Claire Hughes, head of corporate reporting, and Craig Maidment, senior finance manager. I welcome our witnesses to the meeting and invite the minister to make a short opening statement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Hazel, in your submission, you said:
“BEFS wishes to highlight its position that not enough action is being taken in policy and practice to promote the productive reuse of vacant and derelict buildings and brownfield land, including for housing.”
Would the proposed levy be a stimulus for that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Over the years, the committee has pushed for that, and I am pleased to say that there have been some changes in that regard.
Colleagues are keen to come in.