The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4037 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I thank the minister and his officials for their evidence. In due course, we will publish a short report to the Parliament setting out our decision on the draft instrument.
We will now have a break until 11.05, when we will reconvene following the remembrance events in the garden lobby.
10:33 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Under the next item on our agenda, we will take evidence from two panels of witnesses as part of our stage 1 scrutiny of the Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill. For the first panel, we are joined by Natasha Douglas, land and planning manager, Bancon Homes; Fionna Kell, director of policy, Homes for Scotland; and Julie Jackson, general counsel and company secretary, Miller Homes. I welcome you all to the meeting.
We intend to have about one hour for this evidence session, which will be followed by a session with our second panel. I will move straight to questions, and the first is for Julie Jackson.
In your submission, you said:
“evidence shows a site will not be viable if subjected to the levy”.
In your submission, you were talking about smaller sites. One of the issues with the bill is whether the sites that it will apply to should include every house or just those of a certain size. Will you talk us through your views on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That is one of the issues that you have raised in your submission, Natasha Douglas, so Bancon is concerned about that.
In Bancon’s submission, you have also asked why the company is subject to the legislation—it has not been involved in or had any issues with cladding, but it might be adversely impacted. Fionna Kell said something more or less identical in her submission.
The legislation will not include islands, for example, so there is an issue there. Can you talk more about your frustration with that issue?
11:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I have just been advised that the average price of a new-build house in Scotland is £335,447, so the levy would be about 1 per cent of the sale price. Would that not just get passed on to buyers?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
My understanding is that, at today’s prices, it will be about £3.1 billion over 15 years. The £30 million a year that the Government hopes to raise through the levy will be about 15 per cent of the cost, while the rest will be paid by general taxation.
I know that they are all different sizes and shapes, but what is the average price of a new house in Scotland?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Can you talk us through that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Josie Sclater, I suggest that Hazel Johnson has a point. A number of people have raised concerns about building standards over the years. Builders did build according to the standards that applied at the time, and there have been issues over the years. I and members of other committees have looked at the reduced numbers of clerks of works and so on, which has meant that corners have been cut. Does Hazel have a point, in that a fund such as the proposed levy would help, almost as an incentive for builders to be a bit more careful in construction? Otherwise, the levy will fall upon them.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
One thing that seems to have had a major impact on finances is that the finance and local government portfolio is receiving an additional £204.3 million, of which £144 million relates to local government employer national insurance contributions.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I call Michelle Thomson, to be followed by Michael Marra.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Your view is that it is not.