The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4779 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Before I open the discussion to colleagues around the table, I have one final question for you, Mr Pugh. The actions of Government departments, public bodies and others who engage with a public inquiry play a significant role and can contribute significantly to rising costs and extended timelines, which undermines inquiries’ effectiveness and public confidence. In the inquiries that you have been involved in, have you experienced that at all?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That has exhausted questions from committee members, but I have a brief question for each of you on areas that we have not touched on. The first is for you, Mr Pugh.
Interestingly, the Scottish Parliament information centre briefing that committee members received states that 45 per cent of an inquiry’s time is spent on producing the report. Is there any way in which that process could be expedited?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
My second question is for you, Ms Dunlop. Should Government departments and public bodies be required to respond formally to recommendations within a set timeframe?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What might be a reasonable timeframe in which to respond to a report?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
But does that sound to you like a conflict of interest?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Our next agenda item is the second evidence session in our inquiry into the cost-effectiveness of Scottish public inquiries.? I welcome to the meeting the Rt Hon Lord Hardie, who is the former chair of the Edinburgh tram inquiry, and Dr Emma Ireton, associate professor at Nottingham law school, Nottingham Trent University.
We will move straight to questions, because there is so much to dig into. Lord Hardie, you said that public inquiries often reinvent the wheel. Will you say a wee bit about your concerns in that regard?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
One of the issues, and the reason why we are taking this look at public inquiries and their costs, is that the costs seem to be astronomical. Not only does the timescale often run away from people, but there can be a concern that justice not only has to be done but has to be seen to be done. If inquiries take five or 10 years, or even longer on some occasions, there is an issue about that.
Lord Hardie, you have raised the issue of putting a specific budgetary limit on an inquiry. You wrote:
“This approach might undermine public confidence in the Inquiry.”
Surely every other area of public life has a set budget to which it must operate, and indeed a timescale, although the parameters can contain an element of flexibility. You are concerned that public confidence in an inquiry might be eroded if limits were set, but surely public confidence is eroded if public inquiries seem to go on and on, year after year. People might think that an inquiry will last one, two or three years, but they might still be waiting for an outcome after five, six, seven or eight years.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Sorry—that question is for Dr Ireton.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. I will now open up the session to members.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We move to questions from Craig Hoy, to be followed by John Mason.