The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4779 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Mr McGowan, does the COPFS feel that that would be a sensible approach?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The issue is that the public, or individuals who are clamouring for inquiries, now feel that they have been almost short-changed unless an inquiry is judge led.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Mr Kennedy, do you feel that we have lost our way with public inquiries and that it is time for a reset?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We do not really want to be here again in five years, do we?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. I will open up the session to colleagues around the table.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I have to say, from my recall of economic history, that the issues that you talked about, such as concerns about the amount of investment from British companies going overseas, was an issue before the first world war—that is how long that has been an issue for the Scottish and UK economies.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am asking your opinion as an organisation. You have given us a good submission, but Mr Kennedy’s is very direct and robust. The committee is trying to make things better not only for the Scottish taxpayer but for people who want public inquiries to result in the timeous delivery of justice, as they see it. How does it help anyone if an inquiry runs on for five or 10 years, costs hundreds of millions of pounds and makes recommendations that might not be implemented even a year or two after they were made? Surely that in no one’s interests, and that is why I am keen to have your view on it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Surely the COPFS has a view. In paragraph 19 of your submission, you say:
“prior to the setting up of the Sheku Bayoh Inquiry, COPFS and the then Lord Advocate were of the view that there were matters in relation to the circumstances of Mr Bayoh’s death that would be outwith the scope of a Fatal Accident Inquiry and therefore there would be benefit in a Public Inquiry being held.”
You were part of the recommendation that there should be an inquiry. Should the terms of reference not include some kind of recommendation that you would want it to report within a couple of years, say, which does not seem unreasonable to normal people, with a certain cost implication? Instead, that inquiry is costing £50 million overall, including £25 million on the police side.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am asking just out of curiosity. That is the only static budget that I have seen in your whole report.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
As I recall, this was not the reason that was given by the cabinet secretary, but David Phillips of the Institute for Fiscal Studies said that it would be more appropriate to wait until the spending review before publishing the MTFS, which is what the Government has done. That was not the entire reason that she gave, but she did touch on it somewhat. Is there an argument for that?