The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3539 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
So, it becomes a self-perpetuating cycle.
Mr McGowan, you say in your submission that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service’s approach to public inquiries is that
“One Deputy Crown Agent coordinates COPFS’ response to ensure there is an overview of the way in which inquiries are dealt with and to provide consistency in responses.”
You go on to say that
“costs incurred by COPFS in relation to Public Inquiries come together into one budget line to enable the better control of costs.”
How are those costs being controlled?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Is that not a bit like marking your own homework? I will let Mr Kennedy come back in, but he said that
“Independence is essential—but it must be balanced with accountability ... while working within a framework that ensures value for public money.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We talked about the opportunity costs of public inquiries on the police—the impact on the services that the police deliver—such as officers being diverted into inquiries. Mr McGowan, you also helpfully provided a couple of tables about the impact on the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. The Sheku Bayoh inquiry has cost your office more than £1 million and the child abuse inquiry more than £4.8 million. What impact has having to deliver those inquiries had on your services? What is not being done because your staff are focusing on them?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The Scottish Police Federation has been open about the impact on the service that the police provide. You are being a wee bit coy about the impact on your service. I will push you further on that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Mr Kennedy, in your submission, under “Cost Monitoring”, you say:
“There are no enforceable mechanisms for monitoring costs. This leads to unchecked overruns.”
You advocate for
“Independent financial oversight ... Maximum inquiry durations unless formally extended by Parliament”
and
“Annual public reporting on progress and spend”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I have a question about the implementation of recommendations, which, as I touched on earlier, has been a bugbear for many people. About 3,250 recommendations have come forward from 54 completed UK inquiries since 1990, and hundreds of them do not seem to have been implemented. Mr Kennedy suggested that there should be
“Statutory deadlines for publication of implementation plans ... Annual reporting to Parliament on progress”
and
“Independent post-implementation review”,
which, for example, was done in Jersey two years after the child abuse inquiry there. Would the COPFS support a post-review?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Would the COPFS suggest anything specific to improve the public inquiry system?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You put the tariffs in perspective in your report, which says that trade with the US accounts for only 2 per cent of Scottish gross domestic product. The concern is about the impact on specific sectors of the Scottish economy. In fact, the impact will be felt not only by certain sectors but by certain geographic areas—the obvious example is whisky. Obviously, you are keeping a very close eye on the matter.
You now project that GDP will increase by 1.2 per cent this year, instead of the 1.6 per cent that you predicted in December. Is that still likely to be the case? You also say, in paragraph 34 of your report, that there will be “broadly flat employment growth”.
09:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I just have a few more points, one of which is about pay. There is an underlying frustration with the Scottish Government’s pay policy, and we have discussed that on a couple of occasions. On average, it is an increase of 3 per cent over three years and 9 per cent in total. We already seem to be breaching that with national health service pay and, understandably, unions in other sectors are looking for similar pay increases. What impact would there be on those projections if, for example, pay settlements across the public sector mirrored those of the NHS?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I have just a couple of further points. The first relates to social security. I am curious about employability services. The wee footnote in your report says:
“The forecast of Employability Services is an indicative forecast and includes spending on Fair Start Scotland and elements of No One Left Behind.”
You have the figure increasing from £52 million to £60 million to £73 million in the current year, which is an increase of about 15 to 20 per cent per year, and then you have it projected to go from £73 million to £70 million and remain at that level for five years. Is there a reason for that?