The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3259 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
You have almost touched on the next question that I was going to ask, which is about a concern. The Health, Social Care and Sport Committee’s “Stage 1 Report on the Patient Safety Commissioner for Scotland Bill” said:
“Stakeholders noted concerns over ... the potential for overlap and duplication of roles and responsibilities within the system, and the future role of the proposed Commissioner within an already complex landscape.”
It is clear that there are issues relating to where the commissioner will operate relative to the existing landscape. How can the commissioner really work within that landscape effectively without there being duplication and overlap?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I have a question for Clare Haughey before I open up the session to colleagues around the table. We had a round-table session last week. One of the issues that came up in that session was that commissioners could potentially take away some of the democratic accountability of ministers. Where do you think that the patient safety commissioner fits in with ministerial responsibility?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Do you think that there is enough parliamentary oversight of that landscape, which, to put it mildly, does seem to be rather complex?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I note that the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner falls within your remit. On scrutinising that individual’s work and the work of his team, he gave really interesting evidence when he came to this committee, and I was very impressed by the work that is being done. Would your committee consider not just taking round-table evidence, as we do, but going out to visit the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner to look at the work that is being done on the ground, for example? Do you think that that approach might be beneficial in assessing the work of a specific commissioner, such as the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. That concludes the committee’s questioning. Do you wish to make any further points before we wind up the session?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
How is the success—or not, as the case may be—of such a commissioner measured? One thing that this committee is concerned about in a whole host of areas is outcomes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. Thanks.
Audrey, you have said that a victims and witnesses commissioner
“should be for a time-limited period”
and that
“Parliament would want to see clear evidence that the post of Commissioner has noticeably improved the experience of victims and witnesses.”
How do you envisage the Parliament being able to scrutinise that effectively?
09:45Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I am sorry to interrupt you, but that is one of the things that we are trying to grasp—how we evaluate the difference that the commissioners make. If a commissioner was not there, what would the difference be? For example, what would the difference be for children and young people? Could the work be done by the Government or any other organisation? There are issues of democratic accountability as well, of course.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
The commissioner gives you a lot of evidence and the committee asks a lot of questions and so on, but how do you evaluate her effectiveness? Do you take it at face value or do you examine the commissioner in other ways to see whether she is delivering the work that she is supposed to do in relation to her remit? How do you assess that in relation to her budget and whether she is delivering efficiently and effectively against her budget?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning, and welcome to the 17th meeting in 2024 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee.
Agenda item 1 is an evidence-taking session for our inquiry into Scotland’s commissioner landscape. We are joined in the room by Audrey Nicoll, convener of the Criminal Justice Committee, and remotely by Clare Haughey, convener of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee. Good morning, and welcome to the meeting. I intend to allow around an hour for this session, and we are going to move straight to questions.
Audrey, I want to begin by asking you about your committee’s report on the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, in which you said:
“We remain to be convinced that a strong case has been made for the establishment of a Victims and Witnesses Commissioner. Instead, we consider that better outcomes may be achieved by focusing spending in areas which have more direct and immediate benefit for victims and witnesses.”
How did the committee arrive at that conclusion?