The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 746 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Keith Brown
If we are agreed on the fact that there is more than enough talent to fulfil all the roles, something is happening, given the failure rate and the inability to appoint to the positions as and when required. That would suggest that something in the system is not allowing us to tap into that talent.
On your point about our needing to step back and look more widely, have you drawn any comparisons with what happens in Wales, Northern Ireland or England in relation to those issues?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Keith Brown
Thanks very much.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Keith Brown
How would you justify the blurring as opposed to the elimination of boundaries? Why is blurring the right way to go?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Keith Brown
Would you say that it is systematic?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Keith Brown
I notice that a comparison is not made between Scotland and Wales or Northern Ireland, so is the comparison with England as supplemented by UK expenditure on acquisitions?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Keith Brown
The comparison with Europe refers more generally to culture. I have heard Scotland compared to Lithuania, Ireland and the Czech Republic. The vital difference between Scotland and those countries is that Scotland is not a sovereign state and does not have access to full powers and so on. Are there any available comparisons with autonomous regions or devolved areas in Europe, or are there only comparisons with independent countries?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Keith Brown
Coming back to the visitor levy, you will know that it is dependent on whether councils want to progress with it. Therefore, I am interested in the fact that it is appearing in what are essentially budget submissions to the Scottish Government. Is the ask that the Scottish Government, which is leaving this entirely to councils, be more forceful in asking councils, first of all, to have such a levy, and, secondly, to direct those proceeds to culture, museums and whatever else? That question is for any of the witnesses, but I think that it is an absolutely legitimate approach, and it should perhaps be the first call on any such revenues. After all, that is how you build investment for the future and bring in future visitors. However, what is the ask here, and of whom is it being made?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Keith Brown
I have quite a few questions, mainly for Rachael Browning. First, the notion that the Scottish Government has introduced the possibility of a visitor levy to hide cuts does not seem to fit with a £20 million increase this year and a £100 million increase up until 2028-29. You mention that £4 million is going into the new funding programme for museums: museum futures. You also say:
“We hope that museums will receive a fair share of the funding yet to be allocated”.
Would the £4 million come out of the £20 million? If not, do you want that further fair share of funding to come on top of the £20 million?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Keith Brown
In general terms, you compare Scotland’s situation very unfavourably with England and with the rest of Europe, although the European comparison refers more generally to culture rather than only museums. Why is that the case? It is not what we hear from other witnesses.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
Keith Brown
At one point, you mention that the situation was not as good as in England.