Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 21 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 746 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Keith Brown

I am interested in anything that could be helpful in preventing the undermining of a target by the inevitable extraneous events that can affect it, for democratic accountability as much as anything else.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Keith Brown

I have a very brief question that will probably have a brief answer. Is there any information on former forces personnel accessing either further or higher education? I know that it will be a small number and difficult to track.

I did not expect the answer to be that short, to be honest.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Keith Brown

Does anyone engage with the armed forces regarding resettlement programmes or such things?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Widening Access to Higher Education

Meeting date: 26 February 2025

Keith Brown

I have one last question on that point. This is probably well known to other members of the committee, but not to me. You mentioned Australia, but how does Scotland perform in Europe and United Kingdom comparisons, in terms of widening access?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

European Union Alignment

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Keith Brown

The deposit return scheme was an innovation that was ruled out by the UK Government.

Mr Baldock, do you have any ideas on whether innovation is being stifled, or is that not really noticeable?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

European Union Alignment

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Keith Brown

I have a comment to make, which the witnesses might have views on. This is not how Brexit was meant to be, is it? We were sold the idea of fantastic free trade and all the trade deals that were going to happen.

Instead, three or four years on, there are no border controls and, as Mr Kerr and others have pointed out, we are in a very poor negotiating position for the future. I think that fishing rights will be the big thing that people will be coming after. The fact is that Brexit has not really given us the green and pleasant uplands that we were sold. I suppose that you guys have to operate within the framework that you have, but do you have any comments on how things are turning out?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

European Union Alignment

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Keith Brown

I am looking at some of the figures that the committee has in relation to fish. I know that we do not have any fish experts here today, but there seems to have been a pretty dramatic reduction in the non-EU figure; it has more than halved, I think, since 2014. In fact, if you strip out inflation, the total is negligible. The picture for red meat seems to be better.

Given the discussion that we have had about border controls, which, of course, the UK Government has never bothered to have in recent years, how can they now be portrayed as smoothing out trade? I understand the rationale for UK producers feeling at a disadvantage—after all, they have to comply with the controls—but border controls are, in themselves, an added barrier to trade and an anti-free-trade measure.

10:15  

However, my question is about divergence and innovation, as two sides of the same coin, and whether either the Scottish Government’s policy of alignment or the constraints of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 might inhibit innovation. I do not know who would innovate a piece of red meat, to be honest, although I presume that production methods and so on are susceptible to innovation. Are you aware of any areas of innovation that might be being stifled, or would you not know about the absence of innovation if, for example, it was something that was just taken off the table by either the internal market act or the Scottish Government’s determination to align with the EU?

I will turn first to the person with the most puzzled look on their face. [Laughter.] Lucy Ozanne, does the internal market act or the alignment policy inhibit innovation?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

European Union Alignment

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Keith Brown

If witnesses have no other comments, that is fine for me.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

European Union Alignment

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Keith Brown

I think that you called David “James”, convener.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Keith Brown

I am new to the committee, so I did not hear the evidence that was previously provided. I also have to say that I have never known or been on a committee that conducts its business in the way that this one has done, so it is a bit of a surprise to me.

I have two questions—unfortunately, both are for Donna Stewart, not Shirley Rogers or John Booth, so I apologise for that. Donna, you said earlier that the decision on whether to publish the survey results was entirely down to SATH, yet the committee has received information that suggests that SATH was asked not to publish the results. Is the position that that is what the SQA said to SATH, and it then decided not to publish? Might SATH have felt that it could not publish, because the SQA said that it did not want it to, and it felt that it had no option? How would you describe SATH’s approach?