The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 751 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
If you are not able to say what evidence there is, how do we know that children get water?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
I would quite like to see the evidence, because it does not seem to me that there is clarity. There really should be clarity from each local authority, which should provide a simple explanation of what it does in each case.
My final question is this. If every child were to be provided with such a reusable bottle, that would enable a form of national procurement for every local authority. The way that procurement goes is that you get a better price with a national procurement scheme, because you are buying many more of exactly the same thing rather than having possibly 32 separate procurement exercises for bottles. Have you considered that? Has the minister had or sought advice about whether a national scheme would offer not only those cost benefits, because you get cheaper unit costs for larger procurements, but certainty that children actually get personal access to a reusable source of water, which they can have all the time? That would provide an answer to Callum’s petition and provide near certainty that every child is properly hydrated, which, with respect, you are not able to say is the case at the moment.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
And there was no apparent desire to communicate either.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
In fact, it was quite the opposite. Is that right?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
I am not in the same party but that does not really matter. We can imagine that he would have done that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
This next question might be too difficult for you to answer.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
We are pleased that the extent to which schools provide water for pupils is monitored, but what is the upshot of that provision? What evidence do you have from each local authority on it?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
Our purpose is not to carry out an investigation. We cannot do that. I feel guilty saying that, but that is just the way it is. We cannot do that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
I support the recommendation that Alexander Stewart has just made. I would add that specific reference in the letter to the minister could be made to, and perhaps a copy appended of, Alasdair Allan’s submission, because he makes several very good points about the value of having island residents on boards relating to ferries, transportation and health.
Alasdair Allan goes into a couple of reasons for that, which I will briefly set out. First, he says that organisations are improved by having people who rely on the services rather than outsiders who do not use the services. That is a commonsense point and seems to be a practical example of the benefits of having local residents on the boards rather than—without being pejorative—outsiders.
Secondly, he says:
“Having ... island-based board members would also make for a better flow of ideas from communities at an early stage, rather than consultation taking place after decisions have, essentially, already been made.”
That, too, is a very good point, convener, and one that perhaps we could ask that the minister bear in mind with further future appointments to public bodies.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Fergus Ewing
In backing that recommendation, I note that the information that we have been provided with states that there have been sudden cardiac deaths at races where caffeine gum was promoted, although there are no investigations of any potential link. Scottish Athletics and sportscotland have warned of health risks. I mention that because, plainly, if cardiovascular risks are involved and death has occurred, that is a very serious matter. We should get that further evidence in some detail.