The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1646 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Shona Robison
In 2025-26, the City of Edinburgh Council will receive more than £1 billion to support day-to-day services. That is an extra £60 million, or an additional 5.9 per cent, compared with 2024-25. The council will also get an additional capital allocation and support to help it to meet the costs of employer national insurance contributions.
Miles Briggs asked about the funding formula. I am sure that he will be aware that any funding formula has to be agreed within COSLA. That is challenging when there are 32 local authorities, which often have their own interests. The fact that they do not always have the same interests can make the process very challenging.
We cannot impose a funding formula. Were we to do so, that would be received very badly by local government. It will be for representatives of the City of Edinburgh Council to persuade their COSLA colleagues of the need for any changes to the funding formula.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Shona Robison
Now you are talking down the yard.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Shona Robison
Does Sarah Boyack not recognise that the investment that has been made in affordable housing over many years in Scotland dwarfs the investment that has been made in England by the UK Government, including the figure that she has just cited?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Shona Robison
I will say two things to Alexander Stewart. First, we have provided a record level of funding—£15 billion—for local government, as has been recognised by COSLA, which is a cross-party organisation. Secondly, we have given as much funding for employer national insurance contributions as we are able to, given the funding that we are likely to receive from the Treasury.
Finally, I note that, if we had listened to Alexander Stewart, we would have had £1 billion of unfunded tax cuts to the budget, which would have meant less, not more, money for local government. The Tories have no credibility on this issue.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Shona Robison
National security is a reserved responsibility of the United Kingdom Government. However, there are also devolved powers that are relevant to national security. Critical national infrastructure are the facilities, systems, sites, information, people, returns and processes that are deemed necessary for a country to function.
There are currently 13 official designated critical national infrastructure sectors, where responsibility is split between devolved Administrations and the UK Government. National security concerns are brought forward and given appropriate prominence in budget negotiations and infrastructure prioritisation.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Shona Robison
Given the changes in the Scottish Government’s devolved powers over the past decade, we must be cognisant of the fact that it is not possible to apply direct like-for-like comparisons in Scottish Government funding levels, notably due to the devolution of around £5.6 billion for the administration of social security benefits. However, the local government finance settlement has increased by 41 per cent since 2015-16, which is a real terms increase of 2.4 per cent.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Shona Robison
The Scottish Government will continue to support local authority finances, and we will continue to make the case jointly with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and civic Scotland that His Majesty’s Treasury must fully fund the actual cost of the changes to employer national insurance contributions to Scotland’s public sector.
In the interim, we have provided more than £15 billion of funding through the local government settlement, as well as committing £144 million to contribute specifically to the increased cost of employer national insurance contributions.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Shona Robison
The Scottish Government provides funding to support local authorities with payments relating to their PFI and PPP contracts by way of the annual local government settlement.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Shona Robison
I agree with Marie McNair—this Government has always made it clear that the PFI approach that was used by Labour has not delivered best value for the taxpayer. That is why we brought it to an end and introduced more affordable schemes in order to reduce the drain on the public purse and stop excessive profits.
Unfortunately, we are still paying for the legacy of those mistakes, and we will be doing so for many years. It is a timely reminder of the incompetence of Labour in government on those matters.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Shona Robison
I agree with Clare Haughey that the cost of the UK Government’s employer national insurance contributions shortfall in funding is an opportunity gap for Scotland’s public services. With our partners in COSLA, we have repeatedly raised concerns with the UK Treasury about the impact on public services if that reserved tax increase is not fully funded.
As I already confirmed to Jackie Dunbar, it is incumbent on all members of the Scottish Parliament to protect public services in Scotland by calling on the Chancellor of the Exchequer to fully fund the impact on public services, not just in Scotland but across the other devolved Administrations.