The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 695 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Should that clarification be in the bill or in subsequent guidance? Guidance has been mentioned a few times.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is why I raised the issue.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
We had evidence at the start of today’s session about the lack of enforcement. Do you think that there is no gap here at all? Would having a higher standard persuade some of those organisations not to break the law?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That would be useful, because I am certainly aware of breaches where nothing happens, which has an impact on communities. Do other witnesses have any views on this?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Questions have been raised about a course of conduct and failures that are not just a one-off incident or accident but harm caused over time. I was thinking about repeated failures—pollution in particular—in which existing environmental legislation has been breached but there has been no action and legal accountability has not been triggered. We have existing legislation and we have this bill proposal. Should the bill include the concept of a course of conduct, such as the impact of pollution over time? Would that fill the gap between failures under existing legislation and ecocide? There is a gap here, and no accountability.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
One of the points that was made in the earlier questions was about the lack of action in such cases—that such reporting happens, but without any legal consequence for the perpetrators.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Does anyone else have a view?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is very helpful—thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Sarah Boyack
Do the witnesses have a view on the suggestion that a new commissioner could have shared back-office functions? Not only would we be learning from the lessons in Wales with regard to efficiency, but we could share knowledge and best practice. We could have memorandums of understanding between existing organisations such as Audit Scotland and existing commissioners, to ensure that work was not being replicated and that we could get maximum impact of any investment in a new commissioner. Who would like to respond to that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Sarah Boyack
I thank the witnesses for their answers, and I will reflect in particular on the aspects where the witnesses feel that the bill could be amended to strengthen it. I very much appreciate the chance to speak to the committee today.