The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 894 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
I have a bit of a cold, so I hope that my voice will not disappear. What have the benefits been of the significant increase in renewables over the past 10 to 20 years? What lessons have been learned with regard to those benefits? I also want to ask about where we have missed out, but perhaps we can start with the benefits. I will go to Claire Mack first, as she represents the sector.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
I will follow up on the question that the convener asked about the extent to which the instrument will incentivise businesses to invest now, given the changes that are going to take place incrementally, but actually quite significantly, over the next few years. I was thinking particularly about the hydrogen sector and the discussions about grey, green and blue hydrogen. To what extent will the instrument support investment now because these changes are taking place?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
I will ask a question that I was going to ask much later, because it fits in here.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
That leads me on to my next question, which is about the community benefits and community ownership angle.
Professor Hannon, you said that there was a missed opportunity there and that we were not moving forward in relation to how we get the right community benefits that will benefit people in the way that is needed. Is there not a mix of community benefit opportunities and community ownership opportunities? For example, at a recent cross-party group meeting, we heard about Point and Sandwick, which has huge community benefits compared with other projects. Is there a way for the Scottish Government to encourage more community or shared ownership of renewables projects, so that the focus is not just on community benefits but on community ownership, which could involve councils, individual communities or co-operative models? How could that be delivered in practice?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
I did, convener, because I had not heard of a correction slip either, so I wanted some clarification on it. It is useful to have had that clarified on the record that such a matter can be addressed in two ways. Neither is significant, but as long as the solution gets the support of all four nations, it will be workable, and the committee will be informed. Having that on the record is really important.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
Yes, I have a follow-up question. I appreciate the comments that Gemma Grimes has just made; indeed, I know of constituents who were about to put in heat pumps and then, when the funding for the solar went, they stopped. It was all about joined-up thinking—it was about getting an incentive and then making that investment. That raises issues about supply chains and, potentially, jobs and confidence, so I very much agree with what you have just said.
You also mentioned the just transition. Some research out there suggests that, if people on lower incomes had solar panels, it could result in quite a significant benefit to their homes. Should we also be looking at homeowners in this respect, too, and trying to more solar in situ right across the sector, as it will be good for the economy, help the just transition and bring down climate emissions at the same time?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
There is also turbine production. You mentioned Berwick Bank. We could build the kit in Leith. How can we provide certainty and ensure that that actually happens? That involves not only approving a project, but ensuring that the renewables developers follow on, do the manufacturing and develop the supply chains. They will have the confidence once their project has been approved.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
Matthew, would you like to respond on what opportunities exist, what we have delivered and what more we could have done?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
I will come straight back in on that answer. Do we not miss out on joined-up thinking regionally? Is there more that the Scottish Government could do on that? You have all mentioned heat pumps in the context of heating, but you have not mentioned heat networks, which could be a good way of using electricity to provide heat where that electricity is produced.
Furthermore, on transport, EVs have been mentioned, but not railways or other big infrastructure projects that could use power close to where it is generated. I ask Claire Mack to briefly come back in on that, and then Gemma Grimes, who I see is nodding her head.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Sarah Boyack
Yes—it is it just a supplementary question for Claire Mack. A few minutes ago, you mentioned the benefits of looking at innovative shares. The vast majority of the ScotWind projects are owned by countries outwith Scotland. When I say “countries”, I mean that some Governments outwith Scotland are getting really good benefits from investing in ScotWind projects. How do we get more of those real benefits for Scotland? You talked about the national wealth fund and SNIB. If the Scottish Government took a share in projects, would there be opportunities that could give us an economic benefit as revenues come in over the years?