The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 810 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
My question follows on from the comment that you just made about how it is not necessarily a one-off catastrophic incident. Should the definition of ecocide in the bill also apply to incremental harm or a course of conduct over time?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is okay.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That leads on to my next question. Section 9 of the bill extends enforcement powers in relation to ecocide. Is it sufficient to ensure that the relevant authorities will have the power to investigate a potential offence? Is there a gap in the powers of any regulatory or enforcement bodies to investigate potential severe damage to the environment within their remit?
From reading the witnesses’ expressions, I can see that they are looking reflective.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Do other witnesses have thoughts on those ideas?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Okay. Murdo MacLeod, do you have a view on the issue?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is helpful. Do other witnesses have any comments on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is helpful. I am conscious that we are running out of time—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Have I got one volunteer who will be short and snappy?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
On the issue of alternative options, the Carnegie UK report contained a range of different ideas, such as having a conveners forum in the Parliament to ask MSPs to do this work.
I spoke with representatives of Audit Scotland, and it would need resource, because it does not have the capacity at the moment. Other suggestions involve a Government-appointed advisory council and an independent round table. Do the witnesses have any thoughts about those alternatives and about the benefits and disbenefits of having a commissioner as a different way of doing things?
It seems not. I could probably ask questions all day, but that might not be tactically smart.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
It was about the range of public bodies and the urgency of implementing sustainable development and taking a more joined-up approach to policy coherence. The Christie commission was nearly 15 years ago, and we did not take that forward. It is thinking about that policy coherence and the potential of the proposed commissioner to support the range of organisations that do not have sustainable development or wellbeing on their agendas.