The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 810 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Do you think that there is an issue about a lack of alignment with EU legislation on that issue?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I have a final question about the defence of necessity. It is included in the bill. Is it important to have it for exceptional cases?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That was a very sharp response as well. Thank you. Do Rachel Killean and Ricardo Pereira agree?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thank you. Ricardo Pereira, do you have a brief comment on that issue?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Clare Moran, do you want to come in on this?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
The issue of penalties has been mentioned already, but I would like to dive into that a bit more. The bill references penalties of up to 20 years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine for an individual, and an unlimited fine for an organisation.
The committee has heard views that existing maximum penalties available under the 2014 act do not allow for alignment with developments in EU law under the environmental crime directive. We are interested in your views about the proportionality of the penalties in the bill.
Iain, do you want to come in first?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I see that Rachel Killean wants to answer. Please be brief, because I do not want to take so much time that my colleague cannot ask his questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Do we have experience of other legislatures that have taken that approach?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is helpful.
My next question is about remediation being provided by an operator, rather than just a compensation payment, and the issue of the confiscation of the proceeds of crime. Does the bill go far enough in those areas, or should it go further? It has been suggested that those penalties could be imposed under existing laws, such as the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. What do you think the best options are, whether in the bill or elsewhere?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I will follow up with a question on thresholds for liability. Section 1 says that an offence of ecocide is committed if the person
“intends to cause environmental harm, or ... is reckless as to whether environmental harm is caused.”
Many stakeholders have agreed with that, but others have suggested that liability should be broadened to include negligence, as corporations might be unlikely to set out to cause severe harm.
To what extent do different jurisdictions agree on that issue and the appropriate level of liability?