The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 617 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Sarah Boyack
Yes, the point is that getting it right in the first place means that you do not need the redress. Dr Fifield, do you want to come in on that point?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Sarah Boyack
Okay. Thanks very much.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Sarah Boyack
From the written evidence, for which we are very grateful, and the oral evidence so far, it has come across that there are some really big-ticket issues that need to be addressed. What difference has been made as regards engagement with Environmental Standards Scotland? It is now sitting there, but I was struck by Scottish Environment LINK’s comment that it
“welcomes the acceptance that Scotland is in breach of the access to justice requirements of the Aarhus Convention in relation to costs”.
How do we ensure that a difference is made in that respect?
Perhaps we can start with Lloyd Austin. There seems to be a big gap between what Environmental Standards Scotland was meant to achieve and the narrowness of what has been expected of it thus far. Once Lloyd has commented, we can pick up what the other submissions had to say.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Sarah Boyack
Have you analysed the different costs of increasing modal shift? We have lost so many bus services. Part of the issue is how you stabilise and sustain those services, as the minister has said, but it also about creating new services that attract people, which could be a matter of timings or routes. The community bus fund is £1 million. Is there some issue with start-up costs in order to get this going? Is that the block? Having introduced the 2001 act, I know that there is a huge gap between having the powers available and actually using them.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Sarah Boyack
I am sorry—I was using the fund.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Sarah Boyack
Infrastructure is the issue. Councils are setting their budgets for 2024-25 now, so 2030 is not far away. They are having to make estimates about waste and recycling centres, vehicles and the need for infrastructure, as well as about communication. Local authorities and SOLACE have said that they do not agree with the statistics in the Scottish Government’s financial memorandum. What is your response to that? Do you have other information to fill the huge gap between what Government and local authorities are saying?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Sarah Boyack
This has been a really useful debate and, like others, I was interested to see it coming forward. Again, a lot of this comes back to the issue of finance for local authorities not just to ensure that facilities are available but to communicate with our constituents so that they take the right route and we do not see any more fly-tipping. After all, it damages our communities, and we need to get rid of it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Sarah Boyack
The minister’s opening statement referenced £1 billion of investment in recycling services for local authorities during the previous decade. Is it possible for the committee to get a breakdown of that? Can we also get more information about the recycling improvement fund? The Society of Local Authority Chief Executives and Senior Managers said that the fund is ending in the next year to 18 months. What will replace that? Finance has been an issue for local authorities since the first consultation on the bill in 2019.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Sarah Boyack
In the financial memorandum, do you agree with the cost estimates? To meet the targets, there will need to be investment in infrastructure—that could be in the form of vehicles, recycling centres, community recycling centres and reuse opportunities. There will also need to be revenue expenditure and staff-related investment. However, three local authorities have a recycling rate that is below 30 per cent and only 12 local authorities achieve a rate that is above 50 per cent at the moment. That is a huge gap. How do you bridge that gap, financially?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Sarah Boyack
It has been good getting your evidence. In its written submission, COSLA said that the financial memorandum vastly underestimates the cost for local authorities and overestimates the potential income. That was reinforced by the first witness panel today. Can we get your views from the ground? What would be your asks in order to meet higher recycling targets and to link into the wider net zero and sustainable development goals that were mentioned in your written evidence? May we go to Glasgow first?