The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 810 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I think that that has been done. Sadiq Khan was impersonated online.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I think that a series of data centres is planned in Scotland; it is not just one. It is a big opportunity, so there should be joined-up thinking around that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
I would like to come back to the topic that we nearly got to about energy use and the environmental impact of AI. There are potential positives and challenges, including a huge increase in electricity use, although you could join the dots in terms of excess energy production.
Interestingly, a report by PwC six years ago, and one by the London School of Economics and Political Science last year, showed that we could reduce our greenhouse gas emissions through better use of AI in transport, agriculture, water, energy production and food production. There are big pluses there, but how do we get that built in? The Scottish Government’s AI strategy does not have a section on environmental or energy policy. If we do not join the dots and make those issues central, will we miss a big opportunity?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Is that something of which you are aware? At the moment, we pay £250 million to turn off the turbines every year in Scotland due to constraints, yet data centres could be using that energy in an efficient way.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is a really good example of opportunities and benefits, but I was also asking about data and copyright issues in terms of protecting artists, musicians and people’s cultural rights. That could be about consent to use what people have created, or it could be about compensation. Would you want to come in on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Should that clarification be in the bill or in subsequent guidance? Guidance has been mentioned a few times.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is why I raised the issue.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
We had evidence at the start of today’s session about the lack of enforcement. Do you think that there is no gap here at all? Would having a higher standard persuade some of those organisations not to break the law?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
That would be useful, because I am certainly aware of breaches where nothing happens, which has an impact on communities. Do other witnesses have any views on this?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Sarah Boyack
Questions have been raised about a course of conduct and failures that are not just a one-off incident or accident but harm caused over time. I was thinking about repeated failures—pollution in particular—in which existing environmental legislation has been breached but there has been no action and legal accountability has not been triggered. We have existing legislation and we have this bill proposal. Should the bill include the concept of a course of conduct, such as the impact of pollution over time? Would that fill the gap between failures under existing legislation and ecocide? There is a gap here, and no accountability.