The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 882 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Rhoda Grant
:My question is not so much about the instruments themselves as about legal aid fees. There are increases in the cost of those fees, and I wonder whether the thresholds for the ability to claim legal aid will increase in line with them. For people who are on the margins of getting legal aid or not, the fees could push the costs up. Could the committee write to the Scottish Government to find that out and to flag it as an issue?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Rhoda Grant
The study involved semi-structured BSL interviews with six deaf mothers and a focus group with five signing practitioners. How did you ensure that the approach captured the diversity of experiences in the deaf community, and were there any limitations on interpreting the findings?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Rhoda Grant
:How do we use the learning to better provide services for people? You reached out and provided interpreters. I guess that you did everything that you possibly could to encourage people to take part, and that points to some of the barriers to people getting help. You were reaching out, pulling them in and providing things for them, but there are still huge barriers out there.
10:45
What I am asking is, how do we take your report and make the changes that break down some of those barriers? If people are suffering from domestic abuse, they desperately need support.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
:Will the report show that the system is now better and more analytical? It seems that we have huge amounts of data but we are not really following trends. We are collecting data as lumps and being selective. Where a one-off event happens, it can be catastrophic, but are we following the underlying data to see where progress is or is not being made? Will the report show that we have made progress on explaining the figures better?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
:On the same subject, we are aware of some threats, especially from warming waters, but what research is being carried out on future threats that might not have appeared yet? Are there any algae, toxins or whatever present in waters further south that might have an impact on salmon in the future, given that the waters are warming? Is any of that work being done, or are we just dealing with threats as they appear?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
I totally get that, when mass mortality happens due to unforeseen circumstances, it must be heartbreaking for those who look after the fish. Because it happens in the sea, we perhaps do not empathise with it in the way that we did with foot-and-mouth disease, which was very much in our faces. We are all here to try to create some transparency and confidence and a better understanding of the industry.
We have been told by stakeholders that the Scottish Government’s new analytic framework for identifying persistent high mortality uses thresholds and potentially inconsistent data that might not capture problem sites. How can regulators and the industry show that the method can meet its purpose and trigger action on sites where mortality remains persistently high? That might be slightly different from one-off events, as I am talking about sites that are perhaps not suitable because of persistently high mortality.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
:Further to that, if we control sea lice properly and diminish the number of sea lice, concerns about smolts going past and picking up sea lice will hopefully not be an issue in the future.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
:Thanks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
:I have a wee point to put on the record. Edward Mountain seemed to dismiss the work that is going on on the River Carron. If we are leaving a legacy report, we should tell the next committee to look at the award-winning work that is going on there to conserve wild salmon. I would not dismiss that. I do not think that Edward meant to, but it was the way that he phrased it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
:Yes, but this is about building public confidence and ensuring that people not only understand the data that they see but know that it is robust. We sometimes see headlines about one incident without an explanation of the underlying factors.