The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 743 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
It could be tiny pieces of land that we are talking about.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
They may have already been sacked.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
If a landowner decided to sell carbon credits based on forestry on a common grazing and the crofter came and cut down the trees, the landowner would no longer be able to sell that carbon credit.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
I have a short supplementary question. We quite often see crofts being subdivided, especially when there are several family members to whom someone wants to leave a share of the croft. If someone had three or more crofts that had been subdivided in the past, would that be taken into consideration, so that it would not count against them when the crofts were brought back together again?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
My question for Mark Ruskell follows on from that.
As we heard previously, the Scottish Animal Welfare Commission has taken a different view; it believes that all greyhound race tracks should be banned. Have you spoken to and engaged with the SAWC? Do you understand why it has taken a different view, and has that not changed your mind?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
Is it? The SAWC is very clear that there should be no tracks, whereas your bill talks about oval tracks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
That would not impact on the staff. The owner could possibly recoup losses through the sale, but that would not—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
I cannot quite understand why somebody would keep a grazing share and not have a croft. It seems that this has happened by accident rather than design, but now we are coming to a point at which people are looking at carbon trading, forestry, peatland restoration and the like, and the share in the common grazing could suddenly become very lucrative. Someone might be a dead hand on the community—they might have nothing to do with the community and have no croft there—but they could have a grazing share that they could use to prevent the crofters in the community from using the grazings.
On the point about having the maximum three crofts, there is nothing to prevent someone assigning their inby three crofts but keeping all the grazing shares, which would give them access to a lot more land. It kind of goes against the stated aims of the bill if we do not try to keep the grazing share with the croft or reunite them in instances where they have become separated.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay.